Filozofia ewolucji Charlesa Sandersa Peirce’a a współczesne problemy algorytmów ewolucyjnych

Autor

  • Adam Kłóś

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.2484

Słowa kluczowe:

evolutionary algorithms, genetic algorithms, Neo-Darwinism, Charles Sanders Peirce, the theory of evolution

Abstrakt

The article challenges the view that the Neo-Darwinian theory of evolution
is sufficient to explain the ongoing evolution. The classical evolutionary algorithms
based on that theory suffer from the loss of diversity, stagnation and
premature convergence. The author claims that the cosmetic changes of those
tools are not sufficient to overcome this situation and the change of overall theoretical
framework is required. The proposition of a semiotic theory of evolution
created by Charles Sanders Peirce is revealed as an alternative to the classical
Modern Synthesis. This alternative model of evolution is implemented in
two kinds of evolutionary algorithms: P-EA and SEAM, which simulate evolution
by virtue of cooperation and symbiosis respectively. The new approach to
algorithms constructs shows significant benefits upon classical evolutionary
algorithms in benchmark tests, which may support the original claim that the
accepted theory of evolution needs rethinking today.

Bibliografia

Akhtar J., Koshul B. B., Awais M. M., A Framework for Evolutionary Algorithms

Based on Charles Sanders Peirce’s Evolutionary Semiotics, „Information

Sciences” 236 (2013), s. 93–108.

Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss,

A. Bruks, vol. 1–8, Cambridge 1931–1960.

Adam Kłóś

Delisle R. G., The Uncertain Foundation of Neo-Darwinism: Metaphysical

and Epistemological Pluralism in the Evolutionary Synthesis, „Studies in

History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences” 40 (2009),

s. 119–132.

Flasiński M., Wstęp do sztucznej inteligencji, Warszawa 2011.

Forbes N., Imitation of Life. How Biology Is Inspiring Computing, Cambridge

Gould S. J., Eldredge N., Punctuated Equilibria: the Tempo and Mode of Evolution

Reconsidered, „Paleobiology” 3 (1977) no. 2, s. 115–151.

Jablonka E., Lamb M. J., Evolution in Four Dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic,

Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge

Khakhina L. N., Concepts of Symbiogenesis: A Historical and Critical Study

of the Research of Russian Botanists, ed. M. Margulis, M. McMenamin,

London 1992.

Margulis L., Sagan D., Acquiring Genomes: A Theory of the Origin of Species,

New York 2002.

Peirce C. S., Ewolucyjna miłość (Evolutionary Love), tłum. M. Manna, „Logos

i Ethos” (2010), s. 141–175.

Smith J. M., Szathamáry E., Tajemnice przełomów ewolucji. Od narodzin życia

do powstania mowy ludzkiej, tłum. M. Madaliński, Warszawa 2000.

The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. I: 1867–1893, ed.

N. Houser, C. Kloesel, Bloomington–Indianapolis 1992; vol. II: 1893–1913,

ed. The Peirce Edition Project, Bloomington–Indianapolis 1995.

The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce, ed. C. Eisele, vol. 1–4,

Hague 1976.

Watson R. A., Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and

Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution, Cambridge 2006.

Watson R. A., Pollack J. B., A Computational Model of Symbiotic Composition

in Evolutionary Transitions, „BioSystems” 69 (2003), s. 187–209.

Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, ed. The Peirce Edition

Project, vol. 1–6, 8, Bloomington–Indianapolis 1982–201?.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2018-07-31

Numer

Dział

Artykuły