Theology Under Siege: Reflections of a Troubled Philosopher and a Believer

Wojciech Grygiel

Abstrakt


The transposition of the theological expression into the framework of epistemology suggested by the contemporary philosophy of science is a long-desired project. The presented article offers an overview of the different epistemological and methodological issues that arise when this expression is carried out in the common sense paradigm. It turns that once the necessary change into the mode of knowledge acquisition of contemporary science is made, one can significantly improve theology’s both methodological and conceptual foundations. In particular, this concerns the use of abstract concepts to better penetrate the intricacies of the Divine nature as well as the non-classical logics to improve theology’s inferential basis. The resulting question of the contextuality of theology, namely, its dependence on the conceptual framework and the picture of the world, is also surveyed. Consequently, theology can be perceived as a lexically open project. In conclusion it is argued that while the contemporary theology should retain its common sense exposition for the pastoral and catechetical purposes that allows for the efficient transmission of faith through intuitive knowledge, the state-of-the-art theological research must reach out to to abstract conceptual frameworks to assure the depth of its penetrative insight.


Słowa kluczowe


theology; philosophy of science; picture of the world; logic

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Barbour I., Myths, Models, Paradigms. A Comparative Study of Science and Religion, New York 1976.

Batens D., A General Characterization of Adaptive Logics, Logique et Analyse 173–175 (2001), p. 45–68.

Bocheński J., Między logiką i wiarą: Z Józefem Bocheńskim rozmawia Jan Parys, Montricher 1992.

Brehmer J., Pojęcie duszy w naukach kognitywnych, Filozofia Chrześcijańska 7 (2010), p. 37–63.

Brierley M. W., Naming a Quiet Revolution: The Panentheistic Turn in Modern Theology, in: P. Clayton, A. Peacocke (eds.), In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Grand Rapids–Cambridge 2004, p. 1–14.

Brożek B., Mączka J., Grygiel W. P., Philosophy in Science: Methods and Applications, Kraków 2011.

Chakravartty A., A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge 2007.

Crisp O. D., Rea M. C., Analytic Theology, Oxford 2009.

Dadaczyński J., What Kind of Logic Does Contemporary Theology Need?, in: B. Brożek, A. Olszewski, M. Hohol, Logic in Theology, Kraków 2013, p. 39–60.

Damasio A., Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain, New York 2010.

Dawkins R., The God Delusion, Boston–New York 2008.

Einstein A., Ernst Mach, Physikalische Zeitschrift 17/7 (1916), p. 101–104.

Ford L. S., The Viability of Whitehead’s God for Christian Theology, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 44 (1970), p. 141–151.

Gilson E., Methodical Realism, Front Royal 1990.

Grygiel W. P., Physics in the Service of Theology: A Methodological Inquiry, in: B. Brożek, A. Olszewski, M. Hohol, Logic in Theology, Kraków 2013, p. 293–308.

Hawking S., Mlodinow L., The Great Design, London–Toronro–Sydney–Auckland–Johannesburg 2010.

Heisenberg W., Physics and Philosophy, New York 1958.

Heller M., Michalik A., Życiński J. (red.), Filozofować w kontekście nauki, Kraków 1987.

Heller M., Philosophy of Chance. A Cosmic Fugue with a Prelude and a Coda, Kraków 2012.

Heller M., Sens życia i sens Wszechświata, Tarnów 2002.

Heller M., Wszechświat i słowo, Kraków 1981.

Hodgson P. C., Hegel and Christian Theology: A Reading of the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Oxford 2005.

Isham C., Lectures on Quantum Theory, London 1995.

Keane G. J., Creation Rediscovered, Rockford–Illinois 1999.

Krąpiec M., Poznawać czy myśleć, Lublin 1994.

Łukasiewicz J., O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa, Warszawa 1987.

McFague S., The Body of God: An Ecological Theology, Minneapolis 1993.

Murphey N., Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning, Ithaca–London 1990.

Norton J., The Physical Content of General Covariance, in: J. Eisenstaedt, A. Knox (eds.), Studies in the History of General Relativity: Einstein Studies, vol. 3, Boston 1992, p. 281–315.

Obolevitch T., Kilka uwag na temat relacji fizyki i metafizyki u Arystotelesa, in: S. Wszołek, R. Janusz (red.), Wyzwania racjonalności, Kraków 2006, p. 472–486.

Owens J., Cognition: An Epistemological Inquiry, Huston 1992.

Pieper J., Scholasticsim: Personalities and Problems of Mediaeval Philosophy, South Bend 2001.

Polkinghorne J., One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology, London

Popper K., Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, New York 1962.

Psillos S., Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London–New York 1999.

Russell R. J., Murphy N., Peacocke A., Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, California 2001.

Russell R. J., Clayton P., Wegter-McNelly K., Polkinghorne J., Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, California 1995.

Spence S. A., The Actor’s Brain: Exploring the Cognitive Science of Free Will, Oxford 2009.

Tomasello M., Historia naturalna ludzkiego myślenia, Kraków 2015.

Torretti R., Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, London 1978.

Worall J., Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?, Dialectica 43 (1989), p. 99–124.

Zabieglik S., Krzywe zwierciadło filozofii, czyli dzieje pojęcia zdrowego rozsądku, Warszawa 1987.

Życiński J., Świat matematyki i jej materialnych cieni, Kraków 2013.

Życiński J., Teizm i filozofia analityczna, t. 2, Kraków 1988.




Copyright (c) 2018 Wojciech Grygiel