Paronomasia as an element of communication leading to the recovery of self-identity: A communicologicalbiblicalstudy of Mic 1:10–16

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/sce.02204

Słowa kluczowe:

paronomasia, Book of Micah, communication, identity, orality

Abstrakt

This article examines paronomasia in Mic 1:10–16 as a communicative device directed toward restoring the audience’s awareness of its own identity. The interdisciplinary approach adopted here integrates biblical exegesis with communication studies, taking into account the cultural specificity of ancient Israel and the oral roots of the Hebrew textual tradition. The first part of the article discusses the distinctive features of prophetic communication—its multi-agent structure (God, prophet, addressee), its persuasive intent, and the rhetorical function of phonic devices. The study then proceeds to analyse the ten instances of paronomasia found in Mic 1:10–15, employing the classificatory framework developed by S. B. Noegel. The analysis demonstrates that the wordplays built upon place names of the Shephelah do not serve a merely ludic function, but rather construct a semantic network of references to specific territories, communal bonds, and the people’s relationship with God. Their compositional arrangement forms a chiastic structure whose centre points to frustration and spiritual disorientation as consequences of the deviation from the identity proper to the people of God. The findings suggest that the concentration of paronomastic figures constitutes a deliberate rhetorical strategy aimed at awakening in the audience an awareness of its identity as Israel and at restoring its relationship with YHWH as the ultimate source of that identity. The study further opens, in a preliminary and exploratory fashion, the prospect of applying communication-theoretical tools and Biblical Performance Criticism to future research into the identity-constituting function of phonicity in the texts of the Hebrew Bible.

Bibliografia

Becking, B. (2023). Micah: A new translation with introduction and commentary. Yale University Press.

Ben Zvi, E. (1998). Micah 1.2–16: Observations and possible implications. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 23 (77), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/030908929802307708

Berlin, A. (1985). The dynamics of biblical parallelism. Indiana University Press.

Brown, F., Driver, S. R., Briggs, Ch. A. (2000). A Hebrew and English lexicon of the Old Testament. Hendrickson Publishers.

Casanowicz, I. M. (1894). Paronomasia in the Old Testament. Norwood Press.

Cuffey, K. H. (2023). The literary coherence of the Book of Micah: Remnant, restoration and promise. T&T Clark.

Joosten, J. (2013). Prophetic discourse and popular rhetoric in the Hebrew Bible. Canon & Culture, 7, 43–58.

McKane, M. (1998). The Book of Micah. Introduction and commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark Ltd.

Niditch, S. (1996). Oral world and written word: Ancient Israelite literature. Westminster John Knox Press.

Noegel, S. B. (2021). “Wordplay” in Ancient Near Eastern texts. SBL Press.

Nogalski, J. D. (2024). The Book of Micah. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Ong, W. J. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Routledge.

Pierce, G. A. (2021). Understanding Micah’s Lament for Judah (Micah 1:10–16) through text, archaeology, and geography. In K. V. L. Pierce & D. R. Seely (Eds.), Exploring the history and teachings of the Old Testament (pp. 369–388). Religious Studies Center at Brigham Young University; Deseret Book. https://rsc.byu.edu/approaching-holiness/understanding-micahs-lament-judah-micah-110-16-through-text-archaeology-geography.

Rhoads, D. (2006a). Performance criticism: An emerging methodology in Second Testament Studies – Part I. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 36(3), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/014610790603600304

Rhoads, D. (2006b). Performance criticism: An emerging methodology in Second Testament Studies – Part II. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 36(4), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079060360040401

Schorch, S. (2000). Between science and magic: The function and roots of paronomasia in the prophetic books of the Hebrew Bible. In S. B. Noegel (Ed.). Puns and pundits: Word play in the Hebrew Bible and Ancient Near Eastern literature (pp. 205–222). CDL Press

Szefler, P. (1968). Księga Micheasza. Wstęp, przekład, komentarz. In S. Łach (Ed.), Księgi proroków mniejszych Ozeasza, Joela, Amosa, Abdiasza, Jonasza, Micheasza (pp. 345–416). Pallotinum.

Voth, E. (2005). Orality and writtenness in Ancient Near Eastern prophecy: Its effect on translation as communication in Latin America. The Bible Translator, 56(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/026009350505600302

Walton, J. H., Matthews, V. H., Chavalas, M. W. (2000). The IVP Bible background commentary: Old Testament. IVP Academic.

Wessels, W. J. (1998). Micah 1, an apt introduction to power talks. Skrif en Kerk, 19(2), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v19i2.600

West, T. (2020). The art of biblical performance: Biblical performance criticism and the Old Testament narratives. Journal of Biblical Text Research, 47(10), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2020.10.47.301

Wolff, H. W. (1990). Micah: A commentary. Augsburg.

Opublikowane

2026-06-30

Numer

Dział

Articles