Ethics of transparency: comparative analysis of corporate and independent foundations in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/sce.02203Słowa kluczowe:
non-governmental organizations, corporate foundations, NGO, independent foundations, non-profitAbstrakt
This article analyzes the differences in the level of transparency and the relationship between transparency and ethical orientation in corporate and independent foundations in Poland. Despite the discussions presented in this study and the literature review, the results of the study indicate that corporate foundations are characterized by a higher level of formal transparency than their independent counterparts, which is related to access to organizational resources and the use of formalized management practices. At the same time, it has been shown that the relationship between transparency and ethical orientation varies depending on the type of foundation, suggesting different functions of transparency in corporate and independent organizations. The results obtained indicate the need for cautious interpretation of the mechanisms underlying the observed relationships and the validity of further qualitative research on institutional motivations in the non-profit sector.
Bibliografia
Accountable Now. (2020). New reporting and assessment framework. https://accountablenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/New-Reporting-and-Assessment-Framework.pdf
Behn, B. K., Hall, J. S., & Smith, P. C. (2010). Financial transparency and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from state budget documents. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.06.003
Bethmann, S., & von Schnurbein, G. (2015). Effective governance of corporate foundations (CEPS Working Paper Series No. 8). University of Basel, Center for Philanthropy Studies (CEPS). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214115
Bonterra Tech. (2025). 7 nonprofit annual report examples to inspire your organization (+ free template) [Blog post]. Bonterra Blog. https://www.bonterratech.com/blog/annual-reports
Cabedo, J. D., Fuertes Fuertes, I., Maset Llaudes, A., & Tirado Beltrán, J. M. (2017). Improving and measuring transparency in NGOs: A disclosure index for activities and projects. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 28(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21298
Carroll, A. B. (1991). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. South-Western Publishing.
Charycka, B., Bednarek, J., Belina, A., & Gumkowska, M. (2025). Kondycja organizacji pozarządowych 2024. Skrót raportu [Condition of non-governmental organizations 2024: Report summary]. Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor. https://api.ngo.pl/media/get/271553
Chêne, M. (2013). Key features of NGO accountability systems (U4 Expert Answer No. 358). Transparency International Knowledge Hub. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/key-features-of-ngo-accountability-systems
European Foundation Centre (EFC). (2007). Principles of good practice. https://issuelab.org/resources/13941/13941.pdf
Fink, M., Gärtner, J., Harms, R., & Hatak, I. (2023). Ethical orientation and research misconduct among business researchers under the condition of autonomy and competition. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(2), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05043-y
Forum Darczyńców (2015/2023). Standardy działania fundacji korporacyjnych [Standards of operation for corporate foundations]. https://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/forum_darczyncow_standardy_dzialania_fundacji_korporacyjnych_2015-1.pdf, https://forumdarczyncow.pl/uploads/media/655769c04de5f-standardy-dzialania-fundacji-korporacyjnych-2023.pdf
Forum Darczyńców (2023). Fundacje korporacyjne w Polsce – Raport z badań 2023 [Corporate foundations in Poland – 2023 Research report]. https://www.forumdarczyncow.pl/uploads/media/669119b21fa7d-forum-darczyncow-raport-2023-fundacje-korporacyjne-3.pdf
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Genoud, C., & Vignau, L. (2017). The impact of stakeholders’ influence on transparency of sustainability reports (Thesis). DiVA Portal. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1114774/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 2: General disclosures 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org/pdf.ashx?id=12358
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
Koushyar, S., Longhofer, W., & Roberts, A. (2015). Corporate and independent foundations: Organizational resources, institutional pressures, and patterns of giving. Sociological Science, 2, 588–617. https://doi.org/10.15195/v2.a28
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2022). Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index. Regulation & Governance, 17(4), 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12502
NGO.pl. (2020). What is the difference between an association and a foundation? https://www.ngo.pl/english/how-do-ngos-work-in-poland/what-is-the-difference-between-an-association-and-a-foundation
NGO.pl. (2025). Liczba organizacji pozarządowych w Polsce. Fakty o NGO [The number of non-governmental organizations in Poland. Facts about NGOs]. https://fakty.ngo.pl/fakt/liczba-ngo-w-polsce
Rey-García, M., Liket, K., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Maas, K. (2017). Back to basics: Revisiting the Relevance of Beneficiaries for Evaluation and Accountability in Nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. 27, 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21259
Rhode, D. L. & Packel, A. K. (2009). Ethics and nonprofits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.48558/YWK9-CG82
Sopact. (2026). How to write an impact report: A practical guide. Sopact eBooks. https://www.sopact.com/ebooks/how-to-write-an-impact-report
Sphere Association. (2018). The Sphere handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. https://spherestandards.org/handbook
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Rand McNally.
Thrandardottir, E. (2012). NGO legitimacy: Four models. (Working Paper No. CUTP011). Department of International Politics, City University London. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/2818/
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Dana Boretska (Autor)
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Autorzy publikujący w czasopiśmie udzielają jego wydawcy zgody o następującej treści:
- Autor zachowuje autorskie prawa majątkowe do utworu, a jednocześnie udziela wydawcy czasopisma zgody na jego pierwszą publikację w wersji drukowanej i wersji online na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe oraz zgody na wykonywanie opracowań, w tym przekładów.
- Autor ma możliwość udzielania zgody niewyłącznej na opublikowanie utworu w wersji, która ukazała się w czasopiśmie (np. zamieszczenia go w repozytorium instytucjonalnym lub opublikowania w książce), wraz z informacją o jego pierwszej publikacji w czasopiśmie.
