Re-contextualising Catholic School Religious Education: Educating Young People Spiritually, Morally and Religiously for the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.3610Słowa kluczowe:
religious education, spirituality, Catholic schools, ecclesiastical driftAbstrakt
Philip Phenix’s (1964) book Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education started the ever growing movement concerned with how school education might help young people in their search for meaning, purpose and values in times of rapid cultural change. Today, in globalised, digital, secularised culture, the importance and urgency of this role have never been greater. Religious Education, with core curriculum status in Catholic schools, has both credentials and precedents for studying directly the contemporary human quest for meaning to help resource the spirituality of young people, no matter what their religious disposition. But a ‘course correction’ is needed for the discourse of Catholic Religious Education which has ‘drifted’ almost so exclusively into ecclesiastical terminology that its educational credibility as a valuable spiritual/moral school subject has been eroded, creating an ever widening discontinuity with the realities of the classroom and young people’s spirituality. A more outward-looking and less Catholic-centric emphasis would help, without neglecting commitment to the faith tradition. While concerned with the Australian Catholic sector, the article may well have relevance to other countries and contexts.
Bibliografia
Birch L.C., Personal communication, 1967.
Birch L.C., Confronting the future: Australia and the world: The next 100 years, Melbourne 1975: Penguin.
Boeve L., Interrupting Tradition: An Essay on Christian Faith in a Postmodern Context, Louvain 2003: Louvain Theological and Pastoral Monographs.
Boeve L., Religion after detraditionalization: Christian faith in a post-secular Europe, “Irish Theological Quarterly” (2005) 70 (2), pp. 99–122.
Boeve L., God interrupts history: Theology in a time of upheaval, New York 2007: Continuum.
Boeve L., Communicating faith in contemporary Europe: Dealing with language problems in and outside the church, in: J. Sullivan (Ed.), Communicating faith, Washington 2011: Catholic University of America Press.
Boeve L., Theology at the Crossroads of University, Church and Society: Dialogue, Difference and Catholic Identity, London 2016: Bloomsbury.
Brisbane Catholic Education Office, Religion Meaning and Life Course Description (Draft). Brisbane 2019: Brisbane Catholic Education Office.
Buchanan M.T., The Transmission of Religion: Reconceptualising the Religious Education Leader, in: M.T. Buchanan & A.-M. Gellel, (Eds.),Global Perspectives on Catholic Religious Education in Schools: Volume II: learning and leading in a pluralist world, Singapore 2019: Springer Nature.
Catholic Bishops of NSW & ACT, Catholic schools at a crossroads: Pastoral letter of the bishops of NSW and the ACT, Sydney 2007: Catholic Education Office.
Catholic Episcopal Conference (Australia), The Renewal of the Education of Faith, Sydney 1970: EJ Dwyer.
Congregation for Catholic Education, The Religious Dimension of Education in a Catholic School, 1988, Vatican Website.
Crawford M. & Rossiter G., Missionaries to a teenage culture: Religious education in a time of rapid change, Sydney 1988: Christian Brothers Province Resource Group.
Crawford M. & Rossiter G., Reasons for living: Education and young people’s search for meaning, identity and spirituality. A Handbook, Melbourne 2006: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Festinger L., A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford 1962: Stanford University Press.
Fowler J., Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning, Melbourne 1981: Dove Communications.
Frankl V., Man’s search for meaning, London 1964: Hodder & Stoughton.
Gorman G., Troll hunting: Inside the world of online hate and its human fallout, Melbourne 2019: Hardie Grant.
Grimmitt M.H., Religious education and human development: The Relationship between studying religions and personal social and moral education, Great Wakering 1987: McCrimmons.
Hesburgh T., The challenge and promise of a Catholic university, South Bend 1994: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hill B. V., Exploring religion in school: A national priority, Adelaide 2004: Openbook.
Hill B.V., Values in free fall: Religious education and values in public schools, “Journal of Religious Education” (2006) 54 (2), pp. 51–58.
Hill B.V., Personal communication, 2020.
Hughes P., Putting Life Together, Melbourne 2007: CRA / Fairfield Press.
Hughes P., Educating for Purposeful Living in a Post-Traditional Age, Melbourne 2017: Christian Research Association.
Jackson R., Rethinking religious education and plurality: Issues in diversity and pedagogy, London 2004: Routledge Falmer.
Jackson R., Religious Education for Plural Societies, London 2018: Routledge.
Kohlgraf P., La Croix Report on Archbishop Kohlgraf’s comments, 2019. https://international.la-croix.com/news/german-bishop-opposes-evangelization-as-a-battle-cry-against-reform/11018# (11.11.2019).
Lovat T., What is this thing called Religious Education? (3rd Edition), Terrigal 2009: David Barlow.
McBrien R.P., Catholicism. Melbourne 1976: Dove Communications.
Morey M. M. & Piderit J.J., Catholic higher education: A culture in crisis, New York 2006: Oxford University Press.
NCEC, NCEC 2012 Annual Report. Canberra 2012: National Catholic Education Commission (NCEC).
NCEC, A Framework for Formation for Mission in Catholic Education, Sydney 2017: National Catholic Education Commission (NCEC).
NCEC, Framing Paper: Religious Education in Australian Catholic Schools, Sydney 2018: National Catholic Education Commission (NCEC).
NSW Catholic Education Offices, Syllabus document for Studies in Catholic Thought (Draft), Sydney 2018: NSW Catholic Education Offices.
O’Donoghue T.A. & Byrne D., Historical Inquiry into the Construction of Religion as a School Subject for Catholic Schools in Australia, “eJournal of Catholic Education in Australasia” (2014), Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ecea/vol1/iss1/2.
Pajer F., School-based education and religious culture: A European approach to the problem of teaching religion in school. De La Salle Brothers International (2003) MEL Bulletin 6. Published in the “Journal of Religious Education” (2006) 54 (4), pp. 37–45.
Phenix P., Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education, New York 1964: McGraw Hill.
Pollefeyt D. & Bouwens J., Framing the identity of Catholic schools: Empirical methodology for quantitative research on the Catholic identity of an education institute, “International Studies in Catholic Education” (2010) 2 (2), pp. 193–211.
Pollefeyt D. & Bouwens J., Identity in Dialogue: Assessing and enhancing Catholic school identity. Research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria, Australia, Melbourne 2012: Catholic Education Commission of Victoria and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, Final Draft for Publication). Melbourne: Catholic Education Commission of Victoria and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Published in 2014 by Lit Verlag GambH & Co, Zurich.
Pope Francis I, The interview with Pope Francis I, “La Civiltà Cattolica”, August 2013 (English translation, “America”, September 30, 2013).
Postman N. & Weingartner C., Teaching as a subversive activity, Harmondsworth 1969: Penguin.
Rossiter G., The Place of Knowledge in Religious Education: The Debate over Doctrine in Religious Education, “Our Apostolate” (1977) 25 (4), pp. 214–223.
Rossiter G., Religious Education in Australian Schools, Canberra 1981: Curriculum Development Centre.
Rossiter G., The ‘Catholicity’ of Catholic schools and the development of students’ religious identity, “Word in Life” (1997), 45 (2), p. 20.
Rossiter G., The problem of the erosion of religious identity: Implications for religious education, “Word in Life” (1997), 45 (4), pp. 30–31.
Rossiter G., Historical perspective on the development of Catholic Religious Education in Australia: Some implications for the future, “Journal of Religious Education” (1999), 47(1), pp. 5–18.
Rossiter G., Research on retreats: A study of the views of teachers and students about retreats in Australian Catholic secondary schools, Sydney 2016: Australian Catholic University School of Education NSW.
Rossiter G., Life to the full: The changing landscape of contemporary spirituality. Implications for Catholic school religious education, Sydney 2018: Agora for Spiritual, Moral and Religious Education.
Ryan M., A common search: The history and forms of religious education in Catholic schools (Revised Edition), Brisbane 2013: Lumino Press.
Schweitzer F., Religious individualization: New challenges to education for tolerance, “British Journal of Religious Education” (2007) 29 (1), pp. 89–100.
Second Vatican Council, Gravissimum Educationis,1966, Vatican Website.
Sharkey P., Educator’s Guide to Catholic Identity, Melbourne 2015: Vaughan Publishing.
Sharkey P., Better understanding of the context of religious education: The CEVC Leuven Research, in: R. Rymarz and A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious Education in Australian Catholic Schools: Exploring the landscape, Melbourne 2017: Vaughan Publishing.
Sterkens C., Hermans C.A.M., Van der Ven J.A., Formation of the Religious Polyphonic Self: Interreligious Learning in Religiously Affiliated Schools, in: P. Ploeger & C. Sterkens (Eds.), Search for Meaning. Education into Realms of Meaning in a Plural Society, Kampen 1999: Kok, pp. 219–250.
Strommen M., Five cries of youth, San Francisco 1974: Harper & Row.
Swinton J. & Mowat H., Practical theology and qualitative research, London 2016: SCM.
Westerhoff J.H., Will our Children have Faith?, Melbourne 1976: Dove Communications.
Zakaria F.,GPS. Global Public Square. Program for discussion of contemporary social and political issues on CNN, 2019. See https://www.cnn.com/shows/fareed-zakaria-gps
https://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/category/gps-episodes/
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2020 Graham Rossiter
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Twórca oświadcza, że służą mu prawa autorskie do utworu i że nie są ograniczone w zakresie objętym niniejszym oświadczeniem oraz że utwór jest dziełem oryginalnym i nie narusza praw autorskich innych osób.
Twórca zezwala Uniwersytetowi Papieskiemu Jana Pawła II w Krakowie na nieodpłatne, niewyłączne i nieograniczone w czasie korzystanie z utworu, to jest:
- utrwalanie i zwielokrotnianie: wytwarzanie egzemplarzy utworu techniką drukarską, reprograficzną, zapisu magnetycznego oraz techniką cyfrową;
- obrotu oryginałem albo egzemplarzami, na których utwór utrwalono (wprowadzanie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału albo egzemplarzy, publiczne wystawienie, wyświetlenie, a także publiczne udostępnianie utworu w taki sposób, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i w czasie przez siebie wybranym);
- włączenie utworu w skład utworu zbiorowego;
- udzielanie przez Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie sublicencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0)
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie udostępnia utwór na Platformie Czasopism należącej do uczelni, na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0). Tym samym uprawnia wszystkich zainteresowanych do korzystania z utworu pod następującymi warunkami:
- zostanie podany autor i tytuł utworu,
- zostanie podane miejsce publikacji (tytuł czasopisma i adres internetowy do oryginalnie opublikowanego utworu).
