Interpretations of Quine’s “Naturalized Epistemology” and the Character of “Naturalization of Law”

Marek Jakubiec

Abstrakt


Quine’s project of “naturalized epistemology” is usually interpreted as a rejection of classical epistemology, which becomes merely a “chapter of psychology”. It does not imply, however, a different understanding of the character of naturalization is inadequate or wrong. Susan Haack’s interpretations are briefly analyzed in the paper. Thereafter, they are harnessed as models of interpretation of the “naturalization of law”. The main aim is to point the radical reading of Quine’s project (the replacement model) is not the only acceptable one. Consequently, there are at least three models of the “naturalization of law” that are analogical to the “naturalization of epistemology”. The author details their character.


Słowa kluczowe


Quine; naturalization; epistemology; law; jurisprudence; naturalization of law

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Allen R., Leiter B., Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence, „Virginia Law Review” 87 (2001) 8, p. 1503.

Almeder R., On Naturalizing Epistemology, [in:] Knowledge and Inquiry: Readings in Epistemology, ed. K. Brad Wray, Orchard Park (NY) 2002.

Austin J., The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, London 1832.

Brożek B., O naturalizacji prawa (On the naturalization of law), [in:] Naturalizm prawniczy. Interpretacje, ed. J. Stelmach et. al., Warsaw 2015.

Greenberg M., Naturalism in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Law, „Law and Philosophy” 30 (2011) 4.

Haack S., Evidence and Inquiry. Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology, Cambridge (MA) 1993.

Holmes O., The The Path of The Law, „Harvard Law Review” 10 (1897) 8, pp.

Jakubiec M., O relacji pomiędzy filozofią nauki a jurysprudencją w kontekście problematyki naturalizacji prawa, „Logos i Ethos” 2 (2014), pp. 137–152.

Jakubiec M., Tû-Tû Alfa Rossa a tezy skandynawskiego realizmu prawnego, [in:] Naturalizm prawniczy. Stanowiska, red. J. Stelmach et al., Warszawa 2015, pp. 201–220.

Kelsen H., Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley–Los Angeles (CA) 1967.

Kim J., What is “Naturalized Epistemology?, “Philosophical Perspectives” Vol. 2 (1988), pp. 381–405.

Leiter B., Naturalism in Legal Philosophy, [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Zalta 2012, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism (30.03.2015).

Leiter B., Rethinking Legal Realism: Toward a Naturalized Jurisprudence, “Texas Law Review” 76 (1997) 2, pp. 267–315.

Petrażycki L., O nauce prawa i moralności. Pisma wybrane, Warszawa 1985.

Quine W. van Orman, Epistemology Naturalized, [in:] Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York 1969, pp. 69–90.

Quine W. van Orman, Pursuit of Truth, Cambridge 1990.




Copyright (c) 2015 Marek Jakubiec