Administration of Ecclesiastical Temporal Goods in the Light of the Instructions of the Polish Episcopal Conference of 2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.1989Keywords:
Administration of Ecclesiastical Temporal Goods, Canon Law, Episcopal Conference, Instructions of the Polish Episcopal ConferenceAbstract
The mission of the Church is evangelisation and not acquisition of capital. It is good if the Church has sufficient financial means necessary to fulfil its mission. The Catholic Church has the inherent right, independently of any secular power, to acquire, retain, administer and alienate temporal goods, in pursuit of its proper objectives (can. 1254 of the Code of Canon Law). In order to fulfil its mission in the world, the Church needs to be supported by appropriate material goods and the freedom to administer them. The Code of Canon Law of 1983 introduced a new regulation regarding ecclesiastical property, so as to make sure that the Church could better suit the concept of a “poor Church” that, being in the need of economic resources to achieve its goals, focuses on the instrumental task of such resources: so that the faithful fulfilled their duty in the form of helping in maintaining the Church and its works as part of their fundamental rights and obligations related to the temporal goods; so that spiritual goal of ecclesiastical offices was emphasised and the revenues received were justly distributed. The Polish Episcopal Conference on 25 August 2015 approved the Instruction on the Administration of Ecclesiastical Temporal Goods. In the present article four points will be discussed: The right of the Church to the acquisition, holding and alienating of temporal goods; the Instruction of the Polish Episcopal Conference on the acquisition of temporal goods; the Instruction of the Polish Episcopal Conference on the administration of temporal goods and contracts; the Remuneration for priests.References
Bączkowicz F., Prawo kanoniczne. Podręcznik dla duchowieństwa, t. II, Opole 1958.
De Paolis V., I beni temporali della Chiesa, Bologna 1995.
Incitti G., La Chiesa particolare, en: Corso istituzionale di Diritto Canonico, Milano 2005.
Goti Ordeñana, J., Financiación de la Iglesia, “Revista Española de Derecho Canónico” 58 (2001), p. 699–748.
Kantor R., Odpowiednie wynagrodzenie duchownych w Kodeksie Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r. Analiza kan. 281 § 1, „Prawo Kanoniczne” 54 (2011) nr 3–4, s. 191–222.
Konferencja Episkopatu Polski, Instrukcja w sprawie zarządzania dobrami doczesnymi Kościoła, in: http://episkopat.pl/dokumenty/6918.1,Instrukcja_KEP_w_sprawie_zarzadzania_dobrami_doczesnymi_Kosciola.html (15.11.2015).
López Alarcón M., De los bienes temporales de la Iglesia, in: eds. A. Marzoa, J. Miras, R. Rodriguéz‑Ocaña, Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico, vol. IV/1, Pamplona 1997, p. 25–40.
Martínez Aguilar F. R., Las normas sobre la administración económica en las Iglesias particulares. En especial su aplicación en el derecho particular del cono sur latinoamericano, Montevideo 1998.
Schouppe J. P., Elementi di Diritto Patrimoniale Canonico, Milano 1997.
Sztafrowski E., Podręcznik Prawa Kanonicznego, t. 3, Warszawa 1986.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Kantor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).