Objectivity as the Fruit of Authentic Subjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.3754Keywords:
Objectivity of Human Knowing, Subjectivity and Objectivity, Critical Problem, Transcendental Method, Structure of Human Consciousness, Bernard LonerganAbstract
One of the most important problems of philosophy is the “critical problem”, the problem of bridge between the human mind and the world, the external reality. It is the question of relations between the subject and the object. The interesting solution for this problem is given by Bernard Lonergan SJ (1904–1984), one of the most important Catholic English-speaking thinkers of the twentieth century. It would be difficult to point to someone who influenced the American Catholic philosophy and theology from the inside out more than he did: that is why he is called the “American Rahner „. He tries to connect the great tradition of Thomism and Augustinianism and, on the other hand, classical and modern philosophy, German idealism and English Empiricism. At the heart of his thinking is the theory of the human mind. With the help of transcendental and phenomenological methods, Lonergan demonstrates that the mental structure of man consists of five levels: the empirical level, the intellectual level, the rational level, the responsible level and the level of religious experience, which together create a cumulative process that leads to knowledge and decision. The most important point here is he act of understanding, the insight, which always has a creative moment, especially on the second and third levels, as an effect of the subject’s work. The correct understanding of this moment enables a mediation between the empirical, rational and idealistic understanding of the knowledge process. Correct action on all levels, faithfulness to the nature of the subject, leads to truth – according to Lonergan’s very apt maxim: objectivity is the fruit of the authentic subjectivity.
References
Beards A., Method in Metaphysics. Lonergan and the Future of Analytical Philosophy, Toronto/Buffalo/London 2008.
Crowe F. E., Bernard Lonergan’s Thought on Ultimate Reality and Meaning, “Ultimate Reality and Meaning” 4 (1981), pp. 58–87.
Crowe F. E., Lonergan, London 1992.
Herbut J., Metoda transcendentalna: obiektywność poznania i jej kryterium. Omówienie koncepcji B. J. F. Lonergana, (The Transcendental Method: Objectivity of Cognition and Its Criterion. The Discussion of BJF Lonergan’s Conception), “RocznikiFilozoficzne” 28 (1980), pp. 91–117.
Lonergan B., An Interview with Fr. Bernard Lonergan, S. J., in: A Second Collection: Papers by Bernard J. F. Lonergan, S. J., (ed. W. F. Ryan, B. J. Tyrrell), Philadelphia 1974, p. 209–230.
Lonergan B., A Post-Hegelian Philosophy of Religion, in: A Third Collection: Papers by Bernard J. F. Lonergan, S. J., (ed. F. E. Crowe), London 1985, pp. 202–223.
Lonergan B., Insight. A Study of Human Understanding, London 1983.
Lonergan B., Metoda w teologii, trans. A. Bronk, Warszawa 1976.
Lonergan B., Openness and Religious Experience, in: Collection: Papers by Bernard J. F. Lonergan, S. J., (ed. F. E. Crowe, R. M. Doran), Toronto 1988, pp. 185–187.
Lonergan B., Philosophy of God, and Theology, Philadelphia 1973.
Lonergan B., Questionnaire on Philosophy, “Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies” 2 (1984), pp. 1–35.
Lonergan B., Religious Commitment, in: J. Papin (ed.), The Pilgrim People: A Vision with Hope, Villanova 1970, pp. 44–69.
Lonergan B., Second Lecture: Religious Knowledge, in: A Third Collection: Papers by Bernard J. F. Lonergan, S. J., (ed. F. E. Crowe), London 1985, pp. 129–145.
Lonergan B., The Subject, in: A Second Collection by Bernard Lonergan S.J., ed. W.F. Ryan, B.J. Tyrrell, Philadelphia 1974, pp. 69–86.
Lonergan B., Understanding and Being: An Introduction and Companion to Insight. The Halifax Lectures by Bernard Lonergan, ed. Elizabeth A. Morelli, M. D. Morelli, New York–Toronto 1980.
Lonergan B., Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas (ed. D. B. Burell, C. S. C.), Notre Dame 1967.
McCool G. A., The Philosophical Theology of Rahner and Lonergan, in: R. J. Roth (ed.), God Knowable and Unknowable, New York 1973, pp. 123–157.
Oko D., Łaska i wolność. Łaska w Biblii, nauczaniu Kościoła i teologii współczesnej, Kraków 1997. (Grace and Freedom. Grace in the Bible, the Teaching of the Church and Contemporary Theology).
Oko D., Metoda transcendentalna jako metoda metafizyki po zwrocie antropologicznym, (“The Transcendental Method as a Method of Metaphysics after an Anthropological Turn,”) „Analecta Cracoviensia” 28 (1996), pp. 234–253.
Oko D., The Transcendental Way to God according to Bernard Lonergan, Frankfurt am Main/Bern/New York/Paris 1991.
Oko. D., W poszukiwaniu pewności. Próba transcendentalnego ugruntowania metafizyki w filozofiach Emericha Coretha i Bernarda Lonergana, (In Search of Certainty. An Attempt at Transcendental Grounding of Metaphysics in the Philosophies of Emerich Coreth and Bernard Lonergan), Kraków 2010.
Popper K. R., Droga do wiedzy. Domysły i refutacje, trans. S. Amsterdamski, Warszawa 1999.
Popper K. R., Status poznawczy nauki i metafizyki, „Znak” 285 (1978), pp. 367–387.
Sala G. B., Die Introspektion als Schlüssel zur Erkenntnislehre des hl. Thomas von Aquin,,,Theologie und Philosophie” 49 (1974), pp. 477–482.
Sala G. B., Die Struktur der menschlichenErkenntnis. EineErkenntnislehre, Darmstadt 2009.
Sala G. B., Intentionality versus Intuition, w: G. B. Sala, Lonergan and Kant: Five Essays on Human Knowledge, ed. R. M. Doran, trans. J. Spoerl, Toronto/Buffalo/London 1994, pp. 80–101.
Sala G. B., Kant, Lonergan und der christliche Glaube. Ausgewählte philosophische Beiträge. Festgabezum 75. Geburtstag, (ed. U. L. Lehner and R. K. Tacelli), Nordhausen 2005.
Sala G. B., Lonergan and Kant: Five Essays on Human Knowledge, ed. R. M. Doran, trans. J. Spoerl, Toronto/Buffalo/London 1994.
Sala G., Seinserfahrung und Seinshorizontnach E. Coreth und B. Lonergan, ZKTh 89 (1967), pp. 294–338.
Shaughnessy W. G., The Subject in the Transcendental Method of Bernard Lonergan, in: Faculta Eclesiástica de Filosofía Universidad de Navarra, Excerpta e Dissertatonibus in Philosophia, Pamplona 1992, pp. 229–348.
Tilliette X., Chrystus filozofów. Prolegomena do chrystologii filozoficznej, trans. A. Ziernicki, Kraków 1996.
Vertin M., Philosophy of God, Theology, and the Problems of Evil, “Laval theologique et philosophique” 37 (1981), pp. 15–31.
Walczak W., Wgląd i poznanie. Epistemologia Bernarda J.F. Lonergana, Lublin 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the licence Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorises all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
