Exam Cheating Then and Now: A Comparison of Academic Dishonesty in the World’s Oldest Testing System and Present-day Academia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.14212Słowa kluczowe:
Academic misconduct, academic integrity, cheating in exams, Chinese Imperial examinationsAbstrakt
In recent years, cheating in exams has been reported to be a serious issue in many countries. Some believe the problem to be more severe, due to the development of modern technologies. But academic dishonesty is not a new phenomenon. This article is going to look into the cheating methods used in the world’s first examination system in Imperial China and the means devised to prevent these malpractices. These are compared with examples of exam cheating observed in contemporary societies and the measures that institutions take to safeguard test and certificate validity. Cheating practices in Imperial exams are described on the basis of the available literature and the preserved artefacts. The state of the problem of cheating by contemporary students has been assembled, based on research articles. Despite all the changes that have occurred in educational systems over the years, cheating methods have not in essence changed significantly.
Bibliografia
Adams R., Rising number of pupils caught bringing phones into exams, in: The Guardian, 2019, December 13, https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/dec/13/pupilsphones-exams-gcse-a-level-technology-cheat (12.02.2023).
Akaaboune O., Blix L. H., Carrington L., & Henderson C., Accountability in distance learning: The effect of remote proctoring on performance in online accounting courses. “Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting” 19 (2022) 1, pp. 121–131.
Bawarith R., Basuhail A., Fattouh A., & Gamalel-Din S., E-exam cheating detection system, “International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications” 8 (2017) 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080425.
Bilen E., & Matros A., Online cheating amid COVID-19, “Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 182 (2020), pp. 196–211.
Birks M., Mills J., Allen S., & Tee S., Managing the mutations: Academic misconduct in Australia, New Zealand and the UK, “International Journal for Educational Integrity” 16 (2020) 6.
Buckley Ebrey P., The Cambridge illustrated history of China, Cambridge 1996, Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge Assessment International Education, Cambridge Handbook 2021. Regulations and guidance for administering Cambridge exams, Cambridge 2020, UCLES.
Cheng L., & Curtis A., English language assessment and the Chinese learner, New York/London 2010, Routledge.
Cizek G. J., An overview of issues concerning cheating on large-scale tests, in: J. O’Reilly (ed.), Proceedings of the National Association of Test Directors, Mesa, AZ 2001, NATD, pp. 1–30.
Cizek G. J., Cheating in academics, in: C. Spielberger (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Applied Psychology, San Diego, CA 2004, Academic Press, pp. 307–311.
Cizek G. J., Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use, “Psychological Methods” 17(1) (2012), pp. 31–43.
Crook C., & Nixon E., How Internet essay mill websites portray the student experience of higher education, “The Internet and Higher Education” 48 (2021), pp. 1–9.
Dadashzadeh M., The online examination dilemma: To proctor or not to proctor?, “Journal of Instructional Pedagogies” 25 (2020), pp. 1–11.
Davis J., Interview with a cyber-student: A look behind online cheating, “Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration” 19 (2016) 3, https://www.learntechlib.org/p/193191/ (12.02.2023).
Davis S. F., Drinan P. F., & Gallant T. B., Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do, Chichester 2009, Wiley-Blackwell.
De Weerdt H., Competition over content. Negotiating standards for the civil service examinations in Imperial China (1127–1279), Cambridge, MA 2007, Harvard University Asia Center.
Denisova-Schmidt E., Corruption in higher education: Global challenges and responses, 2020, Brill.
Denisova-Schmidt E., Prytula Y., & Rumyantseva N. R., Beg, borrow, or steal: Determinants of student academic misconduct in Ukrainian higher education, “Policy Reviews in Higher Education” 3 (2019) 1, pp. 4–27.
Drake C. A., Why students cheat, “The Journal of Higher Education” 12 (1941) 8, pp. 418–420.
Elman B. A., A cultural history of civil examinations in late Imperial China. Berkeley 2000, University of California Press.
Elman B. A., Civil examinations and meritocracy in late Imperial China, Cambridge, MA 2013, Harvard University Press.
Fontaine S., Frenette E., & Hebert M. H., Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: The influencing factors, “International Journal of Educational Integrity” 16 (2020) 14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6.
Garavalia L., Olson E., Russell E., & Christensen L., How do students cheat?, in: E. M. Anderman, T. B. Murdock (eds.), Psychology of academic cheating, Burlington, MA 2007, Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 33–58.
Hollis L. P., Ghost-students and the new wave of online cheating for community college students, “New Directions for Community Colleges” 183 (2018), pp. 25–34.
Hollman T., Palmer N., Chaffin D., & Luthans K., Lying, cheating, & stealing: Strategies for mitigating technology-driven academic dishonesty in collegiate schools of business, “Mountain Plains Journal of Business and Technology” 22 (2021) 1, pp. 31–50.
Hussein M. J., Yusuf J., Deb A. S., Fong L., & Naidu S., An evaluation of online proctoring tools, “Open Praxis” 12 (2020) 4, pp. 509–525.
Lancaster T., & Clarke R., Rethinking assessment by examination in the age of contract cheating, in: Plagiarism across Europe and beyond 2017 — Conference Proceedings, Brno 2017, pp. 215–228.
Lathrop A., & Foss K. E., Student cheating and plagiarism in the internet era: A wake-up call, Englewood 2000, Libraries Unlimited.
McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., & Butterfield K. D., Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research, “Ethics & Behavior” 11 (2001) (3), pp. 219–232.
Mellar H., Peytcheva-Forsyth R., Kocdar S., Karadeniz A., & Yovkova B., Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives, “International Journal of Educational Integrity” 14 (2018) 2, pp. 1–21.
Miyazaki I., China’s examination hell. The civil service examinations of Imperial China, New Haven/London 1981, Yale University Press.
Moore M., Ancient Chinese ‘cheat sheets’ discovered, in: The Telegraph, 2009, July 15, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/5834418/Ancient-Chinesecheat-sheets-discovered.html.10.Schirokauer (12.02.2023).
Pavela G., Judicial review of academic decision-making after Horowitz, “School Law Journal”, 8 (1978) 1, pp. 55–75.
Pell D. J., That’s cheating: The (online) academic cheating ‘epidemic’ and what we should do about it, in: J. Baxter, G. Callaghan, J. McAvoy (eds.), Creativity and critique in online learning, Cham 2018, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 123–147.
Peters M., Academic integrity: An interview with Tracey Bretag, “Educational Philosophy and Theory” 51 (2019) 8, pp. 751–756.
Purpura J. E., Davoodifard M., & Voss E., Conversion to remote proctoring of the Community English Language Program online placement exam at Teachers College, Columbia University, “Language Assessment Quarterly” 18 (2021) 1, pp. 42–50.
Richardson H., More students found cheating in GCSE and A-Level exams, in: BBC News, 2018, January 5, https://www.bbc.com/news/education-42578874 (12.02.2023).
Rosmansyah Y., Hendarto, I., & Pratama, D., Impersonation attack-defense tree, “International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)” 15 (2020) 19, pp. 239–246.
Sendur A. M., (Nie)uczciwość akademicka polskich studentów a poświadczanie kwalifikacji [Academic (dis)honesty of Polish students and the certification of their competences], in: A. Dąbrowski, R. Kucharczyk, A. Leńko-Szymańska, J. Sujecka-Zając (eds.), Kompetencje dla XXI wieku: Certyfikacja biegłości językowej [Competences of the 21st century: Certification of language proficiency], Warszawa 2020, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 244–266.
Sendur A. M., Academic malpractice in tests and exams from an international perspective, “Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych” (“Educational Studies Review”), 36 (2022) 1, pp. 153–175.
Sendur, A. M., & Kościńska, A., Kształcenie w sieci — teoria i praktyka. Przewodnik dla nauczycieli języków obcych i nie tylko [Web-based education — Theories and applications. Companion for language teachers and other educators], Krakow 2021, Oficyna Wydawnicza KAAFM.
Shanghai Imperial examination system museum catalogue, The, n.d.
Shon P. C. H., How college students cheat on in-class examinations: Creativity, strain, and techniques of innovation, “Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification” 1 (2006), pp. 130–148.
Spolsky B., The state of the art in language assessment: Notes for the third millennium, “Russian Language Journal” 55 (2005) 180/182, pp. 169–187.
Spolsky B., History of language testing, in: E. Shohamy, I. Or, S. May (eds.), Language testing and assessment. Encyclopedia of language and education, New York 2017, Springer International Publishing, pp. 375–384.
Suen H. K., & Yu L., Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam, “Comparative Education Review” 50 (2006) 1, pp. 46–65.
Whitley B. E., & Keith-Spiegel P., Academic dishonesty. An educator’s guide, Mahwah, NJ 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Twórca oświadcza, że służą mu prawa autorskie do utworu i że nie są ograniczone w zakresie objętym niniejszym oświadczeniem oraz że utwór jest dziełem oryginalnym i nie narusza praw autorskich innych osób.
Twórca zezwala Uniwersytetowi Papieskiemu Jana Pawła II w Krakowie na nieodpłatne, niewyłączne i nieograniczone w czasie korzystanie z utworu, to jest:
- utrwalanie i zwielokrotnianie: wytwarzanie egzemplarzy utworu techniką drukarską, reprograficzną, zapisu magnetycznego oraz techniką cyfrową;
- obrotu oryginałem albo egzemplarzami, na których utwór utrwalono (wprowadzanie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału albo egzemplarzy, publiczne wystawienie, wyświetlenie, a także publiczne udostępnianie utworu w taki sposób, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i w czasie przez siebie wybranym);
- włączenie utworu w skład utworu zbiorowego;
- udzielanie przez Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie sublicencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0)
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie udostępnia utwór na Platformie Czasopism należącej do uczelni, na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0). Tym samym uprawnia wszystkich zainteresowanych do korzystania z utworu pod następującymi warunkami:
- zostanie podany autor i tytuł utworu,
- zostanie podane miejsce publikacji (tytuł czasopisma i adres internetowy do oryginalnie opublikowanego utworu).
