Procedimento come principio inespresso. Proceeding as an Unexpressed Principle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.14204

Keywords:

Principles of law, ecclesiology of the Second Vatican Council, theory of law, juridical reasoning, canon law tradition

Abstract

This paper discusses the possibility pertaining to the field of a new principle of law theorised, according to the communion ecclesiology issued by the Second Vatican Council. By considering the accurate proceeding disposition, the author accepts that a new principle constitutes necessary rules for the correct functioning of the canon law system and, as such, are inducted from the legal reasoning of those entitled to take legal decisions in the process of applying the law, especially the judiciary. Furthermore, it could constitute an integrative tool of the entire legal system. Such a new principle is understood to be of great value, because of the significant role assigned to principles in the theory of law in general. In every case, a new principle evokes by, and alludes to, values that govern the entire canon law science.

References

Baura E., Il Sistema delle invalidita (inesistenza e nullita, annullabilita e rescindibilita) dell’atto giuridico, in: Aa. Vv., L’atto giuridico nel diritto canonico, Città del Vaticano 2002, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, pp. 121–141.

Canosa J., I principi e le fasi del procedimento amministrativo nel diritto canonico, “Ius Ecclesiae” 18 (2006), pp. 551–577.

Condorelli O., La recezione della tradizione nella codificazione latina. Il caso del potere dei vescovi, in: E. Baura, N. Álvarez de las Asturias, T. Sol (eds.), La codificazione e il diritto della Chiesa, Milano 2017, Giuffrè Ed., pp. 121–168.

Corecco E., Valore dell’atto “contra legem”, “Ius Canonicum” 15 (1975) 30, pp. 237–257.

García Failde J.J., Nuevo derecho procesal canónico, 3 ed., Salamanca 1993, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca Ed.

Grola A.C., ‘precedente giudiziale’ in: Enciclopedia giuridica, vol. XXIII, Roma 1990, Giuffrè Ed., pp. 1–15.

Gherri P., L’autotutela amministrativa come supplemento di conoscenza: la Remonstratio canonica (can. 1732–1734 CIC), “Apollinaris” 85 (2012), pp. 7–72.

Gherri P., Introduzione al diritto amministrativo canonico. Metodo, Milano 2018, Giuffrè Ed.

Grocholewski Z., Il sistema dei ricorsi e la giurisdizione dei tribunali amministrativi, in: J. Canosa (ed.), I principi per la revisione del Codice di diritto canonico. La ricezione giuridica del Concilio, Milano 2000, Giuffrè Ed., pp. 461–499.

Ioannes Paulus PP. II, Constitutio Apostolica Sacra disciplina leges, 25 ianuarii 1983, AAS LXXV (1983), Pars II, pp. I–XIII.

Ioannes Paulus PP. II, Allocutio a Summo Pontifice in aula supra porticum vaticana Basilica habita, ad novum Codicem Iuris Canonici, paucis ante diebus promulgatum, publice exhibendum, AAS LXXV (1983), Pars I, pp. 461–462.

Llobell J., La diaconia funzionale della potesta giudiziaria della Segnatura Apostolica con gli altri organismi della Curia Romana: l’ecclesialita dei principi processuali, il Contenzioso amministrativo e le competenze giudiziali nei confronti della Segnatura Apostolica, Coll. Studi giuridici, n. LXXXIX, Città del Vaticano 2010, Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Michowicz P., Ancora sul concetto di diritto soggettivo nell’ordinamento della Chiesa, “Annales Canonici” 17 (2021) 2, pp. 83–100.

Miletti M.N., Stylus iudicandi. Le raccolte di ‘decisiones’ del Regno di Napoli in eta moderna, Napoli 1998, Jovene Ed.

Molloy T.E., The Theological Foundation of Ecclesiastical Due Process, “CLSA Proceedings” 41 (1979), pp. 60–67.

Pagallo U., Introduzione alla filosofia digitale. Da Leibniz a Chaitin, Torino 2005, Giappichelli Ed.

Panizzolo F., La potesta di governo nella vita consacrata, Venezia 2009, Marcianum Press.

Pino G., Il puzzle dei diritti indisponibili, “Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche” 22 (2022), pp. 119–135.

Romano S., L’Ordinamento giuridico, 2 ed., Firenze 1945, Quodlibet Ed.

Vladár V., Stylus Romana curia ako inšpiračny zdroj v histórii a dnes, in: P. Salák jr., L. Mrázková (eds.), Ius honorarium — rímské magistratury a jejich činnost, Brno 2019, Scientia Ed., pp. 78–117.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-16

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

  • to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
  • to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
  • to include the work in a compilation;
  • the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses  Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland

The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the licence Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorises all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:

  • the author and the title of the work will be listed,
  • the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
  • the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
  • no derivative works will be created.

 The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.