The cognitive sciences and their method: a physicist’s perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/acr.1753Abstract
The contemporary research in neurobiology heavily rests on the application of complex experimental techniques. The primary aim is to determine the neuronal correlates of various mental phenomena such as abstract thinking, consciousness, free will etc. The application of the contemporary research in neurobiology to understand the nature and the function of the brain is currently having a strong impact on the classical philosophical discourse carried out in area of the philosophy of mind. In this article, a short analysis of one of the most widely used techniques in the neurobiological research is presented, namely, the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The particular emphasis is to point out to the conceptual difficulties that arise between the language used at the experimental level (spins, molecules) and how this language might acquire its meaning to eventually refer to the mental phenomena represented by appropriate neuronal structures revealed in the experiment. The apparent disunity will be most likely remedied as a more unified theory relating mental phenomena to the specificity of the most fundamental level of the physical reality becomes available.References
Bechtel W., Aligning multiple research techniques in cognitive neuroscience: why is important?, „Philosophy of Science” 69 (2002) no. S3, p. S48–S58.
Brożek B., Philosophy in neuroscience, [in:] Philosophy in science. Methods and applications, ed. B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W. P. Grygiel, Kraków 2011, p. 163–182.
Butterfield J., Isham C., Spacetime and the philosophical challenge of quantum gravity, [in:] Physics meets philosophy at the planck scale, ed. C. Callender, N. Huggett, Cambridge, MA 2001, p. 33–89.
Chalmers D., What is a neural correlate of consciousness?, [in:] Neural correlates of consciousness. Empirical and conceptual questions, ed. T. Metzinger, Cambridge, MA 2000, p. 17–39.
Churchland P. S., Brain-wise. Studies in neurophilosophy, Cambridge, MA 2002.
Cosmides L., Tooby J., Beyond intuition and instinct blindness. Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science, “Cognition” 1994 no. 50, p. 41–77.
Damasio A., Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain, New York 1994.
Davies B., Some recent articles about platonism, “EMS Newsletter” 2009 no. 64, p. 24–27.
Grygiel W. P., Metodologiczne aspekty uprawiania filozofii umysłu w kontekście nauk kognitywnych, [in:] Oblicza racjonalności. Wokół myśli Michała Hellera, red. B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W. P. Grygiel, M. L. Hohol, Kraków 2011, p. 51–62.
Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition, ed. R. Cabeza, A. Kingstones, Cambridge, MA 2006.
Heller M., How is philosophy in science possibile?, [in:] Philosophy in science. Methods and applications, ed. B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W. P. Grygiel, Kraków 2011, p. 13–24.
Huettel S. A., Song A. W., McCarthy G., Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Sunderland, MA 2009.
Keeler J., Understanding NMR spectroscopy, Chichester 2005.
Kurek Ł., Neurofilozofia jako filozofia w kontekście nauki, [in:] Oblicza racjonalności. Wokół myśli Michała Hellera, red. B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W. P. Grygiel, M. L. Hohol, Kraków 2011, p. 63–82.
Maurer A. A., Medieval philosophy, Toronto 1982.
Mumford D., Why I am a platonist, “EMS Newsletter” 2008 no. 70, p. 27–30.
Ogawa S., Lee T. M., Kay A. K., Tank D. W., Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)” 1990 no. 87, p. 9868–9872.
Penrose R., The large, the small and the human mind, Cambridge, MA 1997.
Penrose R., The road to reality, New York 2005.
Quine W.V.O., On what there is, ”Review of Metaphysics” 1948, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 21–38.
The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, ed. R. A. Wilson, F. C. Keil, Cambridge, MA 1999.
Wigner E. P., The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, “Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics” 1960 no. 13, p. 1–14.
Załuski W., Pojęcie osoby w świetle nauk biologicznych, [in:] Oblicza racjonalności. Wokół myśli Michała Hellera, red. B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W. P. Grygiel, M. L. Hohol, Kraków 2011, p. 83–98.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author declares that he owns the copyright to the work (article) and that it is not limited in the scope covered by the above declaration and that the work (article) is an original work and does not infringe the copyright of other persons.
The author allows the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow to use the paper free of charge, non-exclusive and unlimited in time by, i.e.:
– keeping in records and reproduction of the copies of the work using printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technology;
– trade in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded (introduction to the market, lending or rental of the original or copies, public exhibition, display, as well as making the work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it in a place and at a time chosen by them);
– inclusion of the work in a collective work;
– granting by the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow a Creative Commons Sub-licence Authorship Recognition-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiaries 3.0 Poland
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Magazine Platform of the university under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiary Works 3.0 Poland license.
Thus, it entitles all interested parties to use the work under the following conditions:
- the author and the title of the work will be given,
- the place of publication (journal title and internet address of the originally published work) will be indicated,
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial manner,
- no dependent works will be created.
