The space of spirituality in music: the concept of a subject by Eero Tarasti as an instrument for interpreting a phenomenon

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/pms.3707

Keywords:

semiotics, Tarasti, Greimas, sacred music, musical subject, sign, meaning, interpretation, theology, aesthetics

Abstract

The spiritual dimension of music has always been shrouded in a mystery. In 19th c. some desperate attempts were made to capture the spirituality of music by resorting, on the one hand, to the sphere of metaphors and essayism, on the other, to philosophical tools. The aesthetics of emotions, however, began at some point to be uncomfortable. “The inexpressible” of music, be at first its highest virtue, led no farther than to the sphere of poetics without explaining the phenomenon of musical transcendence. The 60’and the 70’of 20th c. brought the instruments of the structural musical semiotics. The latter, despite its neo-positivist and laboratory precision, shunned the significance of extra-musical subject matters, confining its research to some neutral levels and believing in the existence of an objective text of a music work. “The semantic turn” brought a new branch of semiotics exposing the very process of meaning understood as a dynamic act inextricably linked with a cultural context. In this semiotic perspective it is suggested to interpret the phenomenon of spiritual content of music by employing the elements of the concept of a subject defined by Eero Tarasti. The existential Me and the social Self explain many ideas related to extra-musical subject matters of a music piece (particularly those of theological and metaphysical nature) helping to understand the mechanism of merging “cultural subject matters” into semantic relationships.

References

Arendt H., Heidegger M., Korespondencja z lat 1925–1975, przekł. S. Lisiecka, Warszawa 2010.

Balthasar H. U. von, Rozwój idei muzycznej, w: H. U. von Balthasar, Pisma wybrane, t. 2, przekł. M. Urban CSsR, Kraków 2007.

Buczyńska-Garewicz H., Semiotyka Peirce’a, Warszawa 1994.

Davies J. B., The psychology of music, London 1978.

Fontanille J., Soma et séma: Figures du corps, Paris 2005.

Fubini E., Historia estetyki muzycznej, Kraków 2002.

Gombrich E. H., Pisma o sztuce i kulturze, Kraków 2011.

Kravchenko V., The symbolic structure of Alexander Scriabin’s „Mystery”, w: Music and the Arts: Proceedings from ICMS 7, vol. 2, ed. E. Tarasti, Helsinki 2006, s. 712–722 (Acta Semiotica Fennica, 23. Approaches to Musical Semiotics, 10).

Lechte J., Panorama współczesnej myśli humanistycznej. Od strukturalizmu do postmodernizmu, przekł. T. Baszniak, Warszawa 1999.

Molino J., Fait musical et sémiologie de la musique, „Musique en jeu” 1975 num. 17, s. 37–62.

Nattiez J.-J., Fondements d’une sémiologie de la musique, Paris 1975.

Pelc J., Wstęp do semiotyki, Warszawa 1984.

Rosner K., A. J. Greimasa semiotyka narracji, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 67 (1976) nr 2, s. 341–352.

Smith T. A., More Evidence of Numeral–Logical Design in Bach’s „St. Matthew Passion”, „Bach” 17 (April, 1986) no. 2, s. 24–30.

Spitzer M., The Sense of Music: Semiotic Essays by Raymond Monelle, „Music & Letters” 83 (Aug., 2002) no. 3, s. 506–509.

Tarasti E., Introduction to a philosophy of music, w: Music and the Arts: Proceedings from ICMS 7, ed. by E. Tarasti, Helsinki 2006 (Acta Semiotica Fennica, 23. Approaches to Musical Semiotics, 10).

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Section

Artykuły i rozprawy

Similar Articles

1-10 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.