Two Dimensions of Nothingness: Gershom Scholem and the Paradoxes of Jewish Mysticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.2364Keywords:
Judaism, kabbalah, Gershom Scholem, nothingness, Isaac Luria, Franz KafkaAbstract
The article analyzes Gershom Scholem’s kabbalistic philosophy through the notionof nothingness, being a crucial notion of Jewish kabbalah. I argue that Scholem’s thought
might be called the “two dimensions of nothingness” which correspond to the concepts of
creation and revelation. I analyze the nothingness of creation against the background
of the Lurianic kabbalah whereas the nothingness of revelation is analyzed through the
prism of Franz Kafka’s literature. The result of the analysis is the original interpretation of
Scholem’s thought, in which nothingness fails to connote nihilism, having instead a substantial
potential of productivity.
References
Arystoteles, Metafizyka, tłum. K. Leśniak, Warszawa 2009.
Benjamin W., Konstelacje. Wybór tekstów, tłum. A. Lipszyc, A. Wołkowicz, Kraków 2012.
Bielik-Robson A., God of Luria, Hegel, Schelling. The Divine Contraction and the Modern
Metaphysics of Finitude, w: Mystical Theology and Continental Philosophy: Interchange
in the Wake of God, eds. D. Lewin, S. D. Podmore, D. Williams, London–New York,
, s. 36–56.
Bielik-Robson A., Mysteries of the Promise. Negative Theology in Benjamin and Scholem,
w: Negative Theology as Jewish Modernity, ed. M. Fagenblat, Indianapolis 2017,
s. 246–264.
Buber M., Mojżesz, tłum. R. Wojnakowski, Warszawa 1998.
Drob S., Symbols of the Kabbalah. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, Northvale–
Jerusalem 2000.
Fink L., Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos. Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic
Fellowship, Stanford 2003.
Franck A., La Kabbale ou la philosophie religieuse des Hébreux, Paris 1843.
Gershom Scholem. Zwischen den Disziplinen, Hrsg. P. Schäfer, G. Smith, Frankfurt am
Main 1995.
Habermas J., Dialectical Idealism in Transition to Materialism. Schelling’s Idea of
a Contraction of God and Its Consequences for the Philosophy of History, transl.
N. Midgley, J. Norman, w: The New Schelling, eds. J. Norman, A. Welchman, New
York 2004, s. 43–89.
Handelman S. A., The Slayers of Moses. The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern
Literary Theory, Albany 1982.
Idel M., Kabała. Nowe perspektywy, tłum. M. Krawczyk, Kraków 2006.
Lipszyc A., Ślad judaizmu w filozofii XX wieku, Warszawa 2009.
Magid S., From Metaphysics to Midrash: Myth, History and the Interpretation of Scripture
in Lurianic Kabbala, Bloomington 2008.
Moses S., Gershom Scholem’s Reading of Kafka: Literary Criticism and Kabbalah, „New
German Critique” 77 (1999), s. 149–167.
Mystical Theology and Continental Philosophy: Interchange in the Wake of God, eds.
D. Lewin, S. D. Podmore, D. Williams, London–New York 2017.
Negative Theology as Jewish Modernity, ed. M. Fagenblat, Indianapolis 2017.
The New Schelling, eds. J. Norman, A. Welchman, New York 2004.
Platon, Timajos, w: Platon, Dialogi, t. 2, tłum. W. Witwicki, Kęty 2005, s. 657–743.
Schelling F. W. J. von, Światowieki. Ułamek z roku 1815, tłum. W. Rymkiewicz, Warszawa 2007.
Scholem G., Dziesięć ahistorycznych tez o kabale, tłum. A. Lipszyc, w: G. Scholem,
Żydzi i Niemcy. Eseje, listy, rozmowa, tłum. M. Zawanowska, A. Lipszyc, Sejny 2006,
s. 373–381.
Scholem G., Kabała i jej symbolika, tłum. R. Wojnakowski, Warszawa 2014.
Scholem G., Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, New York 1995.
Scholem G., Mistycyzm żydowski i jego główne kierunki, tłum. I. Kania, Warszawa 2007.
Scholem G., Name Gottes und die Sprachtheorie der Kabbala, w: G. Scholem, Judaica 3,
Frankfurt am Main 1973, s. 7–70.
Scholem G., On Jews and Judaism in Crisis. Selected Essays, ed. W. Dannhauser, New
York 1976.
Scholem G., O podstawowych pojęciach judaizmu, tłum. J. Zychowicz, Warszawa 2015.
Scholem G., The Messianic Idea in Judaism, London 1971.
Wohlfarth I., Haarscharf auf der Grenze zwischen Religion und Nihilismus. Zum Motiv
des Zimzum bez Gershom Scholem, w: Gershom Scholem. Zwischen den Disziplinen,
Hrsg. P. Schäfer, G. Smith, Frankfurt am Main 1995, s. 176–256.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]