O relacji pomiędzy filozofią nauki a jurysprudencją w świetle problematyki naturalizacji prawa

Marek Jakubiec

doi:10.15633/lie.800

On the relation between the philosophy of science and jurisprudence in the context of the naturalization of law

Authors

Marek Jakubiec Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.800

Keywords:

naturalism in legal philosophy, philosophy of science, legal theory, legal realism, epistemic value

Abstract

This paper concerns the relation between contemporary jurisprudence and the philosophy of science. The modern naturalistic approach to law seems very important. In the context of the recent rapid development of the empirical sciences concerning human behavior, legal issues may be seen from new perspective. The realistic movement in legal philosophy is one of the most sophisticated, although at first impression it may seem different. The consequence of such an empirical approach is that jurisprudence becomes a purely descriptive discipline. Also many problems regarding the philosophy of science, in particular the controversy regarding the epistemic value of scientific statements, gains a new significance for the philosophy of law. These are discussed in this paper.

Author Biography

Marek Jakubiec, Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

Ur. 1989, absolwent jednolitych magisterskich studiów prawniczych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim oraz filozoficznych I i II stopnia na Uniwersytecie Papieskim Jana Pawła II w Krakowie; doktorant w Katedrze Filozofii Prawa i Etyki Prawniczej na UJ oraz Katedrze Filozofii Przyrody na UPJPII. Zajmuje się głównie filozofią prawa oraz filozofią nauki i epistemologią.

References

Holmes O., The path of the law, „Harvard Law Review” 1987 vol. 10 no. 8.

Motyka K., Petrażycki Leon, [w:] Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu [wersja internetowa: http://www.ptta.pl/pef/pdf/p/petrazycki.pdf].

Petrażycki L., Wstęp do nauki prawa i moralności [w:] tenże, O nauce, prawie i moralności: pisma wybrane, Warszawa 1985.

Ross A., Tȗ-Tȗ, „Harvard Law Review” 1957 vol. 70.

Ross A., Directives and norms, London 1968.

Stelmach J., Sarkowicz R., Filozofia prawa XIX I XX wieku, Kraków 1999.

Hart H. L. A., Scandinavian realism, „The Cambridge Law Journal” 1959 vol. 17 no. 2.

Załuski W., Game theory in jurisprudence, Kraków 2013.

Bjarup J., The philosophy of scandinavian legal realism, „Ratio Juris” 2005 vol. 18.

Brożek B., Some remarks on the naturalization of law, Kraków 2010 (Studies in the Philosophy of Law, V).

Brożek B., Normatywność prawa. Szkic teorii (tekst dostępny na: http://biolawgy.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/normatywnosc.pdf).

Petrażycki L., O pobudkach postępowania i o istocie moralności i prawa, Warszawa 1924, s. 30–31.

Dalberg-Larsen J., Alf Ross and the sociology of law, „Scandinavian Studies In Law” 2005 vol. 48.

Leiter B., Naturalism In Legal Philosophy [w:] Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Stanford 2012, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism/> (30.01.2014).

Llewellyn K., Some realism about realism: Responding to Dean Pound, „Harvard Law Review” 1931 vol. 44 no. 8.

Heller M., Przeciw fundacjonizmowi, [w:] tenże, Filozofia i wszechświat, Kraków 2006.

Reed B., How to think about fallibilism, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 2002 vol. 107 no. 2.

Hawking S., Wielki Projekt, przeł. J. Włodarczyk, Warszawa 2011.

Haack S., Kolenda K., Two fallibilists in search of the truth, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes” 1977 vol. 51.

Popper K., Open society and its enemies, Princeton 2013.

Downloads

PDF (Polish)

Published

2014-11-01

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following rules apply to copyright:

1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
to include the work in a compilation;
the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland

3. The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the license Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorizes all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:

the author and the title of the work will be listed,
the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
no derivative works will be created.

The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.

If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]