The importance of free will and the experience of duty in the thinking of Karol Wojtyła and Immanuel Kant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.32Keywords:
Freedom, Kant, Wojtyła, person, will, self-determination, duty, ActAbstract
By the ignorance of the motives of the critical philosophy Kant’s, many interpreters see his aim not in the rescue, but in the destruction of metaphysics. Kant’s practical philosophy is often misunderstood, as long as the expositors deny the unconditional validity of the moral law, “the only factum of pure reason”. The article tries to point out the similarities (the importance of free will and the experience of duty) in the thinking of Karol Wojtyła and Immanuel Kant. The moral experience, the demand of duty of the categorical imperative (Kant), personalistic standard (Wojtyła), shows the importance of self-determination/will decision towards the human act. Although Wojtyła admits in his work „person and act“, that just the Kant studies have helped to emphasize the will as a self determining factor of the person and the primacy of the will to the feelings, there is no lack of interpreters who like to overemphasize the great influences of Thomism and phenomenology (such as Max Scheler) on the thinking of the Krakow philosopher. Many interpreters ignore the cantian approach without comment. The goal of the article is therefore at least begin to fill this glaring omission. Wojtyła’s and Kant’s thinking is determined by the question of the freedom of the people. In the practical affirmation of the possibility of free actions – in the deed – the morality and dignity of human, which points to the unconditional – God – immortality of man – is revealed. Also Wojtyła, in the sense of Kant, stresses that the mind itself and with its own power is unable to reach the deity and man must engage on the uncertainty and the abyss of faith, when he leaves the island of pure reason. For Wojtyła, the ability to free, responsible, self-determining act is a sign of the inviolability of personal dignity and for Kant (similar to Augustine and Thomas) a determination of each person to the realization of the highest good. The two thinkers see the people in the light of the experience of duty – commandment of love – that can materialize only through action and deed. For Kant, implicitly for Wojtyła also the deference to God is done explicitly by the act.
References
Buttiglione R., Myśl Karola Wojtyły, Lublin 1996.
Feuerbach L., Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft, [in:] ders., Kleine Schriften, Frankfurt a. M. 1966.
Fischer N., Vom Rang und vom Sinn der Gottesfrage in der Philosophie Kants, [in:] Die Gottesfrage in der Philosophie Immanuel Kants, Freiburg im Br. 2010.
Kasper W., Barmherzigkeit. Grundbegriff des Evangeliums – Schlüssel christlichen Lebens, Freiburg im Br. 2012.
Mruszczyk M., Człowiek w interpretacji adekwatnej Karola Wojtyły, Katowice 2010.
Rynkiewicz K., Von der Grundlegung der christlichen Ethik zur Grundlegung der philosophischen Anthropologie. Eine kritische Untersuchung zum Personbegriff bei Karol Wojtyła, Berlin 2002.
Waleszczuk Z., Die Person bei Immanuel Kant und Karol Wojtyła (w przygotowaniu).
Waleszczuk Z., Wolność osoby ludzkiej w ujęciu Karola Wojtyły i Immanuela Kanta, Wrocław 2014.
Winter A., Der andere Kant. Zur philosophischen Theologie Immanuel Kants, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York 2000.
Wojtyła K., Liebe und Verantwortung. Eine ethische Studie, München 1981.
Wojtyła K., Osoba i czyn, Kraków 1969.
Wojtyła K., Świętego Jana od Krzyża nauka o wierze, Lublin 2000.
Wojtyła K., Wykłady lubelskie, Lublin 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Zbigniew Waleszczuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
