Ethics in autonomous robots as philosophy in silico: The study case of phronetic machine ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3576Keywords:
computational modeling, digital humanities, machine ethics, autonomous robots, methodology of philosophy, methodology of ethicsAbstract
The paper explores the application of computing science to the modeling of the ethical concepts. The modeling in computers is denoted as in silico modeling. The in silico method has found applications in biology, chemistry, cosmology, sociology among others. The applications of in silico modeling to philosophical problems (like ethics) are rather infrequent. Yet, the approach discussed in the paper holds the promise of not only facilitating the development of ethical robotics but it also may provide the insights into the philosophical problems themselves (by explicating their implicit structures). The paper provides also a brief overview of the concept of modeling in silico in historical and current contexts
References
Alaieri F., Vellino A., Ethical decision making in robots: Autonomy, trust and responsibility, in: Social Robotics, eds. A. Agah, J.-J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, et al., vol. 9979, Cham 2016, p. 159–168, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16.
Anderson M., Anderson S. L., GenEth: General Ethical Dilemma Analyzer, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Québec 2014, p. 253–261.
Anderson M., Anderson S. L., Machine Ethics, Cambridge 2011.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. J. A. K. Thomson, London–New York 2004.
Beaney M., Analysis, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, Stanford 2018, https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/sum2018/entries/analysis/.
European Parliament, Civil Law Rules on Robotics European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html.
Floridi L., Sanders J. W., On the morality of artificial agents, “Minds and Machines” 14 (2004) no. 3, p. 349–379, doi: 10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d.
Heller M., Evolution of space-time structures, “Concepts of Physics” 3 (2006), p. 117–131.
Heller M., How is philosophy in science possible?, “Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)” 2019 no. 66, p. 231–249.
Hempel C. G., Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs 1966.
Janusz R., O metodach wirtualnych w paradygmacie obiektowym, “Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce” 2007 no. 41, p. 125–131.
Janusz R., Program dla Wszechświata: filozoficzne aspekty języków obiektowych, Kraków 2002.
Janusz R., Relacja etyczno-psychologiczna w ujęciu obiektowym, in: Philosophiae & musicae: księga pamiątkowa z okazji jubileuszu 75-lecia urodzin księdza profesora Stanisława Ziemiańskiego SJ, red. R. Darowski, Kraków 2006, p. 375–380.
Larouche L., Examination of the axiomatic foundations of a theory of change I, “Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic” 9 (1968) no. 4, p. 371–384.
Leite I., Martinho C., Paiva A., Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey, “International Journal of Social Robotics” 5 (2013) no. 2, p. 291–308, doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y.
Newton I., Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Londini 1687.
Oers R. van, Wesselman E., Social Robots, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/social-robots.pdf.
Polak P., Philosophy in science: A name with a long intellectual tradition, “Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)” 2019 no. 66, p. 251–270.
Polak P., Krzanowski R., Phronetic ethics in social robotics: A new approach to building ethical robots (2019), doi: 10.13140/rg.2.2.16802.79049.
Raine D. J., Heller M., The Science of Space-Time, Tucson, AZ 1981.
Randall J. H., Aristotle, New York 1965.
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge 1971.
Reeve C. D. C., Practices of Reason: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford 1992.
Salamucha J., Dowód ex motu na istnienie Boga. Analiza logiczna argumentacji św. Tomasza z Akwinu, “Collectanea Theologica” 54 (1934) nr 1–2, p. 53–92.
Salamucha J., The proof ex motu for the existence of God. Logical analysis of St. Thomas’ arguments, “The New Scholasticism” 32 (1958), p. 327–372.
Searle J. R., Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World, New York 1998.
Sloman A., The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, Science, and Models of Mind, Atlantic Highlands, NJ 1978.
Strzelecki J., Monada = Monada() – interpretacja obiektowa, in: Filozofia i technika, red. J. Sobota, G. Pacewicz, Olsztyn 2017, p. 35–52.
Thagard P., Computational Models in Science and Philosophy, in: Introduction to Formal Philosophy, eds. S. O. Hansson, V. F. Hendricks, Cham 2018, p. 457–467, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_24.
Vallverdú J., Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles, Hershey, PA 2010.
Wallach W., Allen C., Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, Oxford 2009.
Wallach W., Franklin S., Allen C., A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents, “Topics in Cognitive Science” 2 (2010) no. 3, p. 454–485, doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x.
Winsberg E., Computer Simulation and the Philosophy of Science, “Philosophy Compass” 4 (2009) no. 5, p. 835–845, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00236.x.
Winsberg E., Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation, “Science in Context” 12 (1999) no. 2, p. 275–292, doi: 10.1017/S0269889700003422.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]