John McDowell’s theory of moral sensibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.1794Keywords:
John McDowell, moral reasons, sensibility, values, ethicsAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present and analyze John McDowell’s theory of moral sensibility, which successfully grounds ethics in moral reason and values. McDowell’s concept of secondary qualities, serving as a model for values, is one of the most interesting attempts to understand the phenomenon of values and the objectivity of moral requirements.In his considerations McDowell emphasizes the cognitive nature of moral sensibility, which is defined as the ability to recognize the moral requirements imposed by a given situation, accompanied by the capacity of silencing the non‑moral reasons. McDowell attempts to combine his reflections on the ontology and epistemology of value with a theory of motivation. He presents a plausible model of motivational internalism, supported by the analyses of the process of upbringing, which plays a vital role in shaping moral practices.
However, McDowell’s theory is faced with serious difficulties, connected with his rejection of the existence of external standpoint and general principles. There might be some doubts whether McDowell’s conception can be regarded as a successful defence of moral realism and cognitivism in meta‑ethics, since he offers a specific understanding of certain basic philosophical concepts, such as objectivity or knowledge.
References
Aristotle, Nichomachean ethics, trans. D. Ross, Kitchener 1999.
Blackburn S., Errors and the phenomenology of value, [in:] Morality and objectivity, ed. T. Honderich, London 1985, p. 1–22.
Buckland J., Defending McDowell’s secondary property analogy for moral realism, www.academia.edu/1004236/Defending_McDowells_Moral_Realism (12.11.2015).
Mackie J. L., Ethics: inventing right and wrong, Harmondsworth 1977.
McDowell J., Mind and world, Cambridge–London 1994.
McDowell J., Mind, value, and reality, Cambridge–London 2002.
Nagel T., The possibility of altruism, Princeton 1978.
Rutkowski M., Obowiązek moralny a motywacja, Szczecin 2001.
Strobach N., Platonism and anti‑Platonism, [in:] John McDowell: reason and nature, ed. M. Willaschek, Münster 1999, p. 55–58.
Tollefsen Ch., McDowell’s moral realism and the secondary quality analogy, “Disputatio. International Journal of Philosophy” May 2000 no. 8, http://www.disputatio.com/wp‑content/uploads/2000/05/008-3.pdf.
Wiggins D., Needs, values, truth: essays in the philosophy of value, Oxford 1987.
Wright C., Moral values, projection and secondary qualities, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” 1988 suppl. vol. 62, p. 1–26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).