Ecological challenges to ethics

Authors

  • Władysław Zuziak The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/ps.1781

Keywords:

ecology, crisis, ethics, Christianity, anthropocentrism

Abstract

This article is an attempt to shed new light on the environmental challenges of ethics related to over­‑exploitation of the world by humanity. This article aims to formulate guidelines for the project of new ethics that will be able to respond to these challenges, to appreciate the intrinsic value of the world without diminishing the value of human being. The starting point of the analysis is the increase of ecological awareness, observable both among scientists and politicians as well as among citizens and the Church. In the next part of the article, contemporary ecological ethics are compared with traditional anthropocentric ethics. The paper presents the diagnosis of the reasons for the exploitation of nature resulting with ecological crisis and offers a method of overcoming the crisis. It argues in favour of anthropocentrism, but rejects its radical version. In the last part of the paper there is a proposal to create a new ethics, appropriate for us and the world, which would be an extension and refinement of Christian ethics in dialogue with contemporary secular trends.

Author Biography

  • Władysław Zuziak, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow
    Rev. prof. Władysław Zuziak, Chair of Ethics at the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Cracow; MA in theology, PhD in philosophy, Louvain­‑la­‑Neuve, Belgium; 1999 – habilitation in French Philosophy. Publications – i.e.: Społeczne perspektywy etyki and Aksjologia Louisa Lavelle’a. Member of ESSSAT (European Society for the Study of Science and Theology), FUCE (Federation of European Catholic Universities) and PPS (Polish Philosophical Society). Interests: philosophy of man, ethics, personalism, 20th century French philosophy.  E­‑mail: atzuziak@cyf-kr.edu.pl.

References

Bauman Z., Globalizacja: i co z tego dla ludzi wynika, przeł. E. Klekot, Warszawa 2006.

Carson R., Silent spring, Boston 1962.

Compedium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio­‑

dott­‑soc_en.html (05.09.2016).

Devall B., Sessions G., Ekologia głęboka. Żyć w przekonaniu, iż Natura coś znaczy, przekł. E. Mar­glewicz, Warszawa 1995.

Fukuyama F., Koniec człowieka. Konsekwencje rewolucji biotechnologicznej, przekł. B. Pietrzyk, Kraków 2004.

Pope Francis, Encyclical Laudato si’.

Janusz W., Ekorozwój bez niedomówień, „Aura” (1998) nr 12, s. 4–6.

John Paul II, Encyclical Centesimus annus.

Kołakowski L., O szacunku dla natury, [in:] L. Kołakowski, Mini­‑wykłady o maxi­‑sprawach, Kraków 2008, s. 122–127.

Lymbery P., Oakeshott I., Farmageddon: the true cost of cheap meat, London 2014.

Nowicki M., Polityka ekorozwoju Polski. Wyzwania stojące przed ludzkością w XXI wieku, [in:] Ziemia domem człowieka, t. 2, red. J. L. Krakowiak, Warszawa 1997, s. 59–79.

Schumacher E. F., Małe jest piękne, przeł. E. Szymańska, J. Strzelecki, Warszawa 1981.

Singer P., Practical ethics, Cambridge 1993.

Skolimowski H., Filozofia żyjąca. Ekofilozofia jako drzewo życia, Warszawa 1993.

Skolimowski H., Powstanie i rozwój filozofii ekologicznej widziane z perspektywy osobistej, [in:] Wokół eko­‑filozofii, red. A. Papuziński, Z. Hull, Bydgoszcz 2001.

Skolimowski H., Wizje nowego milenium, Kraków 1999.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-20

Similar Articles

21-30 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.