The Afaq (Apak) Khoja Mausoleum in Kashgar as a symbol of Uyghur’s identity (ca 1640–2015)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/acr.2415Keywords:
Afaq Khoja, Eastern Turkistan, Uyghurs, sufism, islam, history of Central Asia, Kashgar, Afaq Khoja Mausoleum, XinjiangAbstract
The Khoja Apak Mausoleum is the holiest Muslim site in Xinjiang. However Apak Khoja (1626–1694) is Uyghur’s controversial hero.
It should be noted that the sources and literature about Apak Khoja go beyond the functionality of devotional religious texts in the world of Islam. Examining the sources about the history of Apak Khoja, the evolution of his worship and also the bitter criticism of his adversaries, one should take into consideration not only the facts but also the importance and meaning of these facts among the Uyghurs. The great meaning of Apak proves that, regardless of the system of values, Apak is a reference point in the history of Uyghurs and the whole history of modern East Turkestan. The presented analysis leads to the following conclusions:
Firstly, Apak’s reputation depends on the political and social context. For example, the negative image of this khoja caused opposition within Sufism Nakshbandiya in Altishahr (the strong competition between Aqtaḡlïq – Nakshbandi sufis from the “White Mountains” and Qarataḡlïq – Nakshbandi order from the “Black Mountains”), which provoked critical literature by Apak’s opponents. In the 20th century Apak did not also have good reputation in the People’s Republic of China, which propagated a sharp criticism on the basis of dialectical materialism during the Mao rule to 1978.
Secondly, the importance of Apak depends on the form of Islam. Uyghurs usually were under the influence of the traditional Maliki sunnism. Although many of them accepted beliefs about the saint Sufis, a part of their community preferred the idea of the salafiya, e.g. the return to the sources of Islam, which – according to
salafiya – is only Koran and sunna. From this point of view, Sufism is a heresy, impure Islam. Apak and his kind of Nakshbandiya is automatically the enemy of this group. In turn, the followers of popular Islam in villages refer with great reverence to the sacred heroes of the past. The mausoleums such as Apak’s monument in Kashgar are sources of their identity.
Thirdly, the personality of Apak is an object of emotional discussion between his supporters and opponents. The ambiguous interpretation of the activity of Apak is consequently developed since the 18th century. An attempt to reach a balanced modern and independent interpretation of the facts must take into consideration the diverse range of sources.
Finally, the continuation of the Apak worship and the national function of his mausoleum in the turbulent history of East Turkestan has produced the literary genre of maqāmāt/manāqib and taẕkiras. They confirm once again the age-old truth of historical analysis that not only facts but also the importance of the events for the community is the key to the understanding of many historical phenomena.
It is quite obvious that history consists of facts and interpretations. This mechanism of interpretation of facts in the taẕkiras caused the popularity of Apak and continuity of his worship, despite the criticism of his adversaries.
References
Äli A., Apaq Khoja, Ürümchi 2000.
Batur Ănwăr, Apak Khoja hăqqida muhakimă, “Shinjang Sifăn Dasho Ilmiy Zhurnali” 3 (1987), p. 57–70.
Beeston A. F. L., Catalogue of the Persian, Turkish, Hindustani and Pushtu Manuscripts in the Bodleian Libarary, Oxford 1954.
Bellér-Hann I., Community Matters in Xinjiang 1880–1949: Towards a Historical Anthropology of the Uyghur, Leiden 2008.
Bellér-Hann I., Making the Oil Fragrant’: Dealings with the Supernatural among the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, “Asian Ethnicity” 2 (2001), p. 9–23.
Bellér-Hann I., Situating the Uyghurs between China and Central Asia, Aldershot 2007.
Bellér-Hann I., Towards a Historical Anthropology of the Uyghur of Xinjiang, [in:] Studies on Xinjiang Historical Sources in 17–20th Centuries, eds. J. A. Millward, Yasushi Shinmen, Jun Sugawara, Tokyo 2010, p. 239–256.
Bellér-Hann I., The Written and the Spoken: Literacy and Oral Transmission among the Uyghur, Berlin 2000.
Bellér-Hann I., The Uyghurs: Strangers in Their Own Land, New York 2010.
Bellew H. W., The history of Kashgaria, Calcutta 1875.
Bellew H. W., Kashmir and Kashghar: A Narrative of the Journey of the Embassy to Kashghar in 1873–74, Boston 2005 (reprint of the book edited in 1875).
Boboyorov H., Collective Identities and Patronage Networks in Southern Tajikistan, Münster 2013.
Boulger D. Ch., The life of Yakoob Beg; Athalik Ghazi, and Badaulet; Ameer of Kashgar, London 1878.
Bovingdon G., Contested Histories, [in:] Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland, ed. F. S. Starr, Armonk 2004, p. 353–374.
Brophy D., The Kings of Xinjiang: Muslim Elites and the Qing Empire, “Études Orientales: Revue Culturelle Semestrielle” 25 (2008), p. 69–90.
Bulag U. E., The Mongols at China’s Edge: History and the Politics of National Unity, Lanham 2002.
Dautcher J., Down a Narrow Road: Identity and Masculinity in a Uyghur Community in Xinjiang China, Cambridge 2009.
Dawut R., Shrine pilgrimage among the Uighurs, “The Silk Road Journal” 6 (2009) no. 2, p. 56–67.
Dawut R., Shrine Pilgrimage and Sustainable Tourism among the Uyghurs Central Asian Ritual Traditions in the Context of China’s Development Policies, [in:] Situating the Uyghurs between China and Central Asia, ed. I. Bellér-Hann, Aldershot 2007, p. 149–163.
Feng Z., Xiang Fei Kao Bian, Keshen Shi 1982.
Flechter J. F., The Naqshbandiyya in Northwest China, [in:] Studies on Chinese and Islamic Inner Asia, ed. B. F. Manz, Aldershot 1995, p. 1–46.
Fletcher J., Ch’ing Inner Asia, c. 1800, [in:] The Cambridge History of China, vol. 10, part 1: Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911, eds. D. Twitchett, J. K. Fairbank, Cambridge 1978, p. 35–106.
Foltz R., The Central Asian Naqshbandī connections of the Mughal Emperors, “Islamic Studies” 7 (1996) no. 2, p. 229–239.
Gilkison A. M., Soul of the Mazar: The Khoja Afaq Mauzoleum (1600s to the Present) and Ujghur Collective Memory, https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=miami.1377021203&disposition=inline.
Gladney D. C., The Ethnogenesis of the Uyghur, “Central Asian Survey” 9 (1990) no. 1, p. 1–28.
Gladney D. C., Internal Colonialism and the Uyghur Nationality: Chinese Nationalism and Its Subaltern Subjects, “Cahiers d’Études sur la Méditeranée Orientale et le Monde Turco-Iranien” 25 (1998), p. 47–63.
Gladney D. C., Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People’s Republic, Cambridge 1991.
Gladney D.C., Representing Nationality in China: Refiguring Majority/Minority Identities, “The Journal of Asian Studies” 53 (1994) no. 1, p. 92–123.
Gullini G., Architettura iranica, Torino 1964.
He B., Yingjie G., Nationalism, National Identity and Democratization in China, Aldershot 2000.
Herdeg K., Formal Structure in Islamic Architecture of Iran and Turkistan, New York 1990.
Jarring G., Return to Kashgar: Central Asian Memoirs in the Present, Durham 1986.
Jarring G., The Ordam-padishah system of Eastern Turkistan shrines, “Geografiska Annaler” 17 (1935), p. 348–354.
Jiang L., Xiang Fei Kao Zheng Yan Jiu, Taibei Shi 1989.
Kabbani M. H., Classical Islam and the Naqshbandi Sufi Tradition, Washington 2004.
Khodarkovsky M., Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800, Bloomington–Indianapolis 2002.
Kim Hodong, Holy War in China: The Muslim Rebellion and State in Chinese Central Asia, 1864–1877, Stanford 2010.
Kugle S. A., Sufis & saints’ bodies: Mysticism, Corporeality and Sacred Power in Islam, North Carolina 2007.
Kuropatkin A. N., Kashgaria: Eastern or Chinese Turkistan, Calcutta 1882.
Kwangmin Kim, Saintly Brokers: Uyghur Muslims, Trade, and the Making of Qing Central Asia, 1696–1814, Fall 2008.
Lawrence B., An Indo-Persian Perspective on the Significance of Early Persian Sufi Masters, [in:] Classical Persian Sufism: from its Origins to Rumi, London–New York 1993, p. 19–32.
Liang Hancao, Ye Xiang Niangniang, [in:] Xiang Fei Kao Bian, ed. Feng Zhiwen, Keshen Shi 1982, p. 89–90.
Lin Zhi, Ji Xiang Niangniang Mazhaer, [in:] Xiang Fei, eds. Yu Shanpu, Dong Naiqiang, Beijing 1985, p. 211–215.
Loubes J.-P., The Rectification of documents of Architecture: the Afaq Khwaja Sufi complex in Kashghar, [in:] Saints and heroes on the Silk Road, Paris 2002, p. 113–
Ma Ming, Xiang Fei Miaohui, [in:] Xiang Fei, eds. Yu Shanpu, Dong Naiqiang, Beijing 1985, p. 215–216.
Mapping Militant Organisations: Jaysh Rijal al-Tariqa al-Naqshbandia, Stanford University, 31.08.2013, http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/75.
Masami H., Le Pouvoir des Lieux Saints dans le Turkestan Oriental, “Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales” 59 (2004) no. 5–6, p. 1019–1040.
Mayer A. C., “Pīr” and “Murshid”: An Aspect of Religious Leadership in West Pakistan, “The Middle Eastern Studies” 3 (1967) no. 2, p. 160–169.
Millward J., Newby L., The Qing and Islam, [in:] Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China, eds. P. Kyle Crossley, H. F. Siu, D. S. Sutton, Berkeley 2006, p. 113–134.
Millward J., Perdue P., Political and Cultural History of the Xinjiang Region through the late Nineteenth Century, [in:] Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland, ed. F. S. Starr, Armonk 2004, p. 27–62.
Millward J., Nabijan T., Political History and Strategies of Control, 1884-1978, [in:] Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland, ed. F. S. Starr, Armonk 2004, p. 63–98.
Millward J. A., Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang, New York 2007.
Millward J. A., Uyghur Muslim in Qianlong’s Court: The Meaning of the Fragrant Concubine, “The Journal of Asian Studies” 53 (1994) no. 2, p. 427–458.
Monttaghifar H., The Traditions of Persian “Tazkirah” Writing in the 18th & 19th Centuries and Some Special Hints, “Advanced in Information Sciences and Service Sciences” 2 (2010) no. 3, p. 111–115.
Newby L. J., The Empire and the Khanatee: A Political History of Qing Relations with Khoqand c. 1760–1860, Leiden 2005.
Niyaz Ibrahim, Tarikhtin qiskichă bayanlar, Kashgar 1989.
Nizamidin Hüsăyin, Qabahăt ‚ăqidă’ yănă bir qetim Appaq Khoja toghrisida, “Shinjang Mădăniyati” (Urumchi) 2 (1989) no. 3, p. 113–154.
Nora P., Between History and Memory: Les Lieux de Mémoires, “Representations” 26 (1989), p. 7–24.
Papas A., Les Tombeaux de Saints Musulmans a Xinjiang, “Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions” 2 (2002), p. 47–62.
Papas A., Soufisme et politique entre Chine, Tibet et Turkestan: Étude sur les Khwajas Naqshbandis du Turkestan Oriental, Paris 2005.
Papas A., Soufisme, Pouvoir et Sainté en Asie Centrale: le Cas des Khwâjas de Kashgarie (XVIe–XVIIIe siècles), “Studia Islamica” 100–101 (2005), p. 161–182.
Papas A., ‘Dansez et chantez’: le droit au samâʿ selon Âfâq Khwâja, maître Naqshbandî du Turkestan (XVIIe siècle), “Journal of the History of Sufism” 4 (2003–2004), p. 169–180.
Privratsky B. G., Muslim Turkistan: Kazak Religion and Collective Memory, Surrey 2001.
Qäshqäri Muhämmäd Sadiq Tazkiräyi äzizan, eds. Nijat Mukhlis, Shämsidin Ämät, Kashgar 1988.
Ridgeon L., Sufism in mediaeval Central Asia: a comparison of the beliefs and practices of the Kobrawiyyah and Naqshbandiyyah orders, “Kokusai Daigaku Chuto Kenkyujo-kiyo” 8 (1994), p. 67–92.
Rudelson J. J., Oasis Identities: Uyghur Nationalism along China’s Silk Road, New York 1997.
Sautman B., Is Xinjiang an Internal Colony?, “Inner Asia” 2 (2000) no. 2, p. 239–271.
Sawada M., Tarim Basin Mazars: A. Field Work Report on the System of Ordam-Padishah Oasis of Yangisar, “Journal of the History of Sufism” 3 (2001), p. 39–61.
Sawada M., Three groups of tadhkira-i khwājagān: viewed from the chapter on Khwāja Āfāq, [in:] Studies on Xinjiang historical sources in 17th–20th centuries, eds. J. A. Millward, Shinmen Yasushi, Sugawara Jun, Tokyo 2010, p. 9–30.
Sayed Jamil Ahmed, Performing and Supplicating Mānik. Pīr: Infrapolitics in the Domain of Popular Islam, “The Drama Review” 53 (2009) no. 2, p. 51–76.
Schwarz H., The Khwajas of Eastern Turkestan, “Central Asiatic Journal” 20 (1976), p. 266–295.
Steingass F. J., A Comprehensive Persian-English Dictionary, Delhi 2003.
Tamimi A. J. (-al), Musings of an Iraqi Brasenostril on Jihad: Comprehensive Reference Guide to Sunni Militant Groups in Iraq, http://jihadology.net/2014/01/23/musings-of-an-iraqi-brasenostril-on-jihad-comprehensive-reference-guide-to-sunni-militant-groups-in-iraq.
Tārīkh-i Kāshghar. Anonimnaia tiurkskaia khronika vladetelei Vostochnogo Turkestana po konets XVII veka: faksimile rukopisi Sankt-Peterburgskogo filiala Instituta vostokovedeniia Akademii nauk Rossii, ed. O. F. Akimushkin, St. Petersburg 2001.
The History of the Khojas of Eastern Turkestan Summarised from the Tazkhira-i-Khwajagan of Muhammad Sadiq Kashghari, ed. R. B. Shaw, transl. N. Elias, Calcutta 1897.
Thum R., Beyond Resistance and Nationalism: Local History and the Case of Afaq Khoja, “Central Asian Survey” 313 (2012) no. 3, p. 293–310.
Thum R., The Sacred Routes of Uyghur History, Harvard 2014.
Tyson D., Shrine Pilgrimage in Turkmenistan as a Means to Understand Islam among the Turkmen, “Central Asia Monitor” 1 (1997), p. 15–32.
Valikhanov Ch., The Russians in Central Asia Their Occupation of the Kirghiz Steppe and the Line of the Syr-Daria: Their Political Relations with Khiva, Bokhara, and Kohan: Also Descriptions of Chinese Turkestan and Dzungaria, transl. R. Michell, London 1865.
Virani Sh. N., The Ismailis in the Middle Ages: A History of Survival, A Search for Salvation, New York 2007.
Waite E., From Holy Man to National Villain: Popular Historical Narratives a about Apaq Khoja amongst Uyghurs in Contemporary Xinjiang, “Inner Asia” 8 (2006) no. 1, p. 5–28.
Werbner P., Embodying Charisma: Modernity, Locality and Performance of Emotion in Sufi Cults, New York 1998.
You Sh., Dong N., Xiang Fei, Beijing 1985.
Zälili Divani, Millätlär Näshriyati, Beijing 1985.
Zarcone Th., Quand le Saint Légitime le Politique: le Mausolée de Afaq Khwaja à Kashgar, “Central Asian Survey” 18 (1999) no. 2, p. 225–241.
Zarcone Th., Les danses Naqshbandî en Asie centrale et au Xinjiang: Histoire et actualité, “Journal of the History of Sufism” 4 (2003–2004), p. 181–198.
Zarcone Th., Sufism from Central Asia among the Tibetans in the 16th–17th Centuries, “The Tibet Journal” 20 (1995) no. 3, p. 96–114.
Zelkina A., Quest for God and Freedom: Sufi Responses to the Russian Advance in the North Caucasus, London 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author declares that he owns the copyright to the work (article) and that it is not limited in the scope covered by the above declaration and that the work (article) is an original work and does not infringe the copyright of other persons.
The author allows the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow to use the paper free of charge, non-exclusive and unlimited in time by, i.e.:
– keeping in records and reproduction of the copies of the work using printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technology;
– trade in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded (introduction to the market, lending or rental of the original or copies, public exhibition, display, as well as making the work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it in a place and at a time chosen by them);
– inclusion of the work in a collective work;
– granting by the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow a Creative Commons Sub-licence Authorship Recognition-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiaries 3.0 Poland
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Magazine Platform of the university under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiary Works 3.0 Poland license.
Thus, it entitles all interested parties to use the work under the following conditions:
- the author and the title of the work will be given,
- the place of publication (journal title and internet address of the originally published work) will be indicated,
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial manner,
- no dependent works will be created.
