Linda problem – the tame solution in question
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/acr.3641Keywords:
conjunction, heuristics, interpretations, Kahneman&Tversky experiment, Linda problem, probabilityAbstract
After a brief reminder of the, so called, Linda problem and its solution by Kahneman & Tversky (KT) (the tame solution), I point out the implications of the solution adopted by the KTs. Among these implications, I emphasize the importance of the relation of probability between the sentences: ‘Linda is active in a feminist movement’ (F) and ‘Linda is a bank teller and active in a feminist movement’ (T∧F); while in KT’s paper the main emphasis was put on considering the relationship between the probability of sentences: ‘Linda is a bank teller’ (T) and ‘Linda is a bank teller and active in a feminist movement’ (T∧F). I offer a critical argument against the zero hypothesis H0 that ‘at least 85% of the respondents will choose the sentence F as more likely than the sentence (T∧F), and the opposite consequently will be selected at most by 15% of the respondents;’ being drawn from the assumptions made by Kahneman and Tversky. This hypothesis will be further partially refuted by means of results from the surveys N0.1. and N0.2. Then the reasoning supporting the result of surveys is presented and finally critical conclusions will be derived.
References
Berendsen A., Hadlich S. J., van Amersfoort J., Looking at ‘Linda’: Is the Conjunction Fallacy Really a Fallacy?, draft, https://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~lukasik/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Looking-at-Linda.pdf (21.02.2019).
Chase R. H. V. M., Many Reasons or just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem, “Thinking & Reasoning” 4 (1998) no. 4, p. 319–352.
Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G., The ‘Conjunction Fallacy’ Revisited: How Intelligent Inferences Look Like Reasoning Errors, “Journal of Behavioural Decision Making” 12 (1999), p. 275–305.
Maguire P., Moser P., Maguire R., Keane M. T., Why the Conjunction Effect Is Rarely a Fallacy: How Learning Influences Uncertainty and the Conjunction Rule, “Frontiers in Psychology” 9 (2018) no. 1011, doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01011.
Messer W. S., Griggs R. A., Another Look at Linda, “Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society” 31 (1993) no. 3, p. 193–196.
Moro R., On the Nature of the Conjunction Fallacy, “Synthese” 171 (2009), p. 1–24.
Olszewski A., A Few Comments on the Linda Problem, “Organon F” 24 (2017), p. 184–195.
Politzer G., Noveck I., Are Conjunction Rule Violations the Result of Conversational Rule Violations? “Journal of Psycholinguistic Research” 20 (1991), p. 83–103.
Tentori K., Bonini N., Osherson D., The Conjunction Fallacy: a Misunderstanding about Conjunction?, “Cognitive Science” 28 (2004), p. 467–477.
Tversky A., Kahneman D., Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment, “Psychological Review” 90 (1983), p. 293–315.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author declares that he owns the copyright to the work (article) and that it is not limited in the scope covered by the above declaration and that the work (article) is an original work and does not infringe the copyright of other persons.
The author allows the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow to use the paper free of charge, non-exclusive and unlimited in time by, i.e.:
– keeping in records and reproduction of the copies of the work using printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technology;
– trade in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded (introduction to the market, lending or rental of the original or copies, public exhibition, display, as well as making the work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it in a place and at a time chosen by them);
– inclusion of the work in a collective work;
– granting by the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow a Creative Commons Sub-licence Authorship Recognition-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiaries 3.0 Poland
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Magazine Platform of the university under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiary Works 3.0 Poland license.
Thus, it entitles all interested parties to use the work under the following conditions:
- the author and the title of the work will be given,
- the place of publication (journal title and internet address of the originally published work) will be indicated,
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial manner,
- no dependent works will be created.
