The canonical administrative proceeding: outline of the problematic through example as the legal value of proofs involving electronic communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/acan.1823Keywords:
ecclesiastic administration, administration act, proceeding, procedure, electronic proof, probative valueAbstract
Given the main goal of the present paper, which was to determine the precise legal value of proofs relating electronic communication, the article studies the problematic concerning the formation and the formalization of the legal canonical proceeding. Considering that the entire ecclesiastical legal system characterizes by its administrative dimension, it was absolutely significant to study those procedures, which peculiar specifications in forming process were not given by the supreme legislator (atypicality of proceedings). The singular emphasis was given to the fact that nowadays, in the process of administrative decision making, the competent authority uses as a proof – indispensable in order to emanate the final decree – emails, text messages, posts published on Facebook or others social media web pages.The conclusion permitted to affirm that the correct assessment of their legal value would depend on authority’s discretionality subordination to the principle of legality.
References
Arroba Conde M. J., Diritto processuale canonico, Roma 20065.
Arroba Conde M. J., Prova e difesa nel processo di nullità del matrimonio canonico. Temi controversi, Lugano 2008.
Canosa J., I principi e le fasi del procedimento amministrativo nel diritto canonico, „Ius Ecclesiae” 18 (2006), s. 551–577.
Gherri P., Introduzione al diritto amministrativo canonico. Fondamenti, Milano 2015.
Gherri P., Lezioni di teologia del diritto canonico, Città del Vaticano 2005.
Gullo C., Gullo A., Prassi processuale nelle cause canoniche di nullità del matrimonio, Città del Vaticano 2009.
Ingoglia A., Inammissibilità delle prove illecite, [w:] Matrimonio e ius. Studi in onore del Prof. Villegiante, a cura di J. E. Avila, C. Gnazi, Città del Vaticano 2006, s. 389–401.
I procedimenti speciali nel diritto canonico, a cura di P. A. Bonnet (ed altri), Città del Vaticano 1992.
Labandeira E., Trattato di diritto amministrativo canonico, Milano 1994.
Moneta P., Gli strumenti del governo ecclesiastico: l’atto amministrativo, [w:] Discrezionalità e discernimento nel governo della Chiesa, a cura di J. I. Arrieta, Venezia 2008, s. 79–95.
Michowicz P., Il discernimento del Superiore maggiore quale elemento determinante dei procedimenti amministrativi, „Annuarium Iuris Canonici”2 (2015), s. 30–50.
Miras J., Canosa J., Baura E., Compendio di diritto amministrativo canonico, Roma 2007.
Palombi R., Valore probatorio dei mezzi di comunicazione elettronica nel processo matrimoniale canonico, [w:] Veritas non auctoritas facit legem. Studi di diritto matrimoniale in onore di Pietro Antonio Bonnet, a cura di G. Dalla Torre, C. Gullo, G. Boni, Città del Vaticano 2012, s. 375–388.
Zuanazzi I., La procedura di formazione dell’atto amministrativo singolare: esigenze pastorali ed esigenze giuridiche, [w:] Discrezionalità e discernimento nel governo della Chiesa, a cura di J. I. Arrieta, Venezia 2008, s. 97–131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The author declares that he owns the copyright to the work (article) and that it is not limited in the scope covered by the above declaration and that the work (article) is an original work and does not infringe the copyright of other persons.
The author allows the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow to use the paper free of charge, non-exclusive and unlimited in time by, i.e.:
– keeping in records and reproduction of the copies of the work using printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technology;
– trade in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded (introduction to the market, lending or rental of the original or copies, public exhibition, display, as well as making the work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it in a place and at a time chosen by them);
– inclusion of the work in a collective work;
– granting by the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow a Creative Commons Sub-licence Authorship Recognition-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiaries 3.0 Poland
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Magazine Platform of the university under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial Use-No Subsidiary Works 3.0 Poland license.
Thus, it entitles all interested parties to use the work under the following conditions:
- the author and the title of the work will be given,
- the place of publication (journal title and internet address of the originally published work) will be indicated,
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial manner,
- no dependent works will be created.
