Is it possible to find a constructive solution in relation to the anomalous incardination (can. 701 CIC/83)?

Authors

  • Przemysław Michowicz Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/acan.1936

Keywords:

cleric, dismissal, incardination, excardination, secondary incardination, lacuna legis

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to find a constructive legal solution after incardinatio abnormis arose as a result of a legal dismissal of the member of the clerical religious Institute. By virtue of a legal dismissal decree, the punished religious-cleric looses a proper canonical status of being consecrated. The author discusses the meaning of the legal dismissal in the Code of Canon Law of 1983. Emphasis is placed on the consequences and circumstances of this act; especially in order to address the problem of incardination of a religious-cleric who was punished with a dismissal. Dimissio modo iure praescripto automatically excardinates from the religious Institute, however without any guarantee or a subjective right or faculty given to the punished cleric in order to be eligible to be incardinated to another ecclesial community according to the can. 265 CIC/83.

References

Bider M., Wydalenie fakultatywne z Instytutu zakonnego według Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego, Lublin 2006, p. 170.

Callejo R., La exigencia de la incardinación y las posibles acefalías, „Estudios Eclesiásticos“ 81 (2006), pp. 792–801.

De Paolis V., I ministri sacri o chierici, [in:] Il fedele cristiano. Il Codice del Vaticano II, a cura di A. Longhitano, Bologna 1989, pp. 103–173.

De Paolis V., La situazione giuridica del religioso sacerdote di voti perpetui uscito dall’Istituto per indulto o per dimissione, „Sequela Christi“ 35/II (2009), pp. 184–202.

De Paolis V., Incardinazioni anomale, [in:] Il fedele cristiano. Il Codice del Vaticano II, a cura di A. Longhitano, Bologna 1989, pp. 351–380.

Kaslyn R. J., The incardination status of the cleric dimissed from a religious institute, „Studia Canonica“ 37 (2003), pp. 99–124.

Michowicz P., La dimissione facoltativa dall’Istituto religioso secondo il Codice di Diritto Canonico del 1983. Le problematiche nell’applicazione della procedura. Theses ad Doctoratum in Utroque Iure, Roma 2013, pp. 212–215.

Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus, Elementi per configurare l’ambito di responsabilità canonica del Vescovo diocesano nei riguardi dei presbiteri incardinati nella propria diocesi e che esercitano nella medesima il loro ministero, „Communicationes“ 36 (2004), pp. 33–38.

Downloads

Published

2014-01-01

Issue

Vol. 10 (2014)

Section

Artykuły

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.