Dasein, authenticity, and choice in Heidegger’s "Being and time"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.1795Keywords:
Dasein, authenticity, inauthenticity, ontological ethicsAbstract
Martin Heidegger’s account of how Dasein becomes authentic appears fraught with contradictions. On the one hand, Heidegger claims that Dasein’s authenticity is the inevitable result of the state of mind of anxiety, i.e., anxiety is both the necessary and sufficient condition of authenticity. On the other hand, he seems to suggest that Dasein’s authenticity involves a choice. I propose an interpretation which views Dasein’s authenticity as a two‑step process, thereby reconciling the apparent contradiction, by making a distinction between Dasein’s becoming authentic and Dasein’s continuing to be authentic. The former is the initial grasp by Dasein of the primordial truth of its existence and is the inevitable result of anxiety. The latter is the willful and repeated affirmation by Dasein of that initial insight and as such requires a choice. I also distinguish between two kinds of inauthenticity: first, the inauthenticity of everyday Dasein; and second, the inauthenticity of Dasein that willingly refuses to acknowledge its existential truth. The latter is interpreted as a choice – either a willful choice or a choice by default. Finally, I suggest that Heidegger’s call to authenticity may be interpreted as a call, not for a normative ethics, but for an ontological ethics.References
Golomb J., In search of authenticity from Kierkegaard to Camus, London 1995.
Heidegger M., Being and time, trans. J. Macquarrie, E. Robinson, New York 1962.
Heidegger M., What is metaphysics?, trans. D. F. Krell, [in:] Pathmarks, ed. W. McNeill, Cambridge 1998, p. 82–96.
Solomon R. C., Continental philosophy since 1750: the rise and fall of the self, Oxford 1988.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
