Nikolay Bierdiajew as an inspiration for philosophical thinking about the hell

Authors

  • Mirosław Pawliszyn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.159

Keywords:

hell, justice, punishment, immortality, heaven

Abstract

In the discussion concerning the understanding of what hell is, the opinion of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev is very important. He is strongly opposed to the attempts to rationalize the problem saying that, sooner or later, they breed fear and anxiety. Hell is pure subjectivity, the inability to go beyond the circle of our spirit’s constant torment. Therefore, hell is not related to objectivity. Rather, it is a total confinement, a state of helplessness. It is being imprisoned in time, which has no end, a dream, from which it is impossible to wake up. Thus, it is not the result of God’s decision, a punishment for committed sins. On the contrary, it is the result of choice, being in favor of your own loneliness. Ultimately, it will remain only a creation of our rationalization. Therefore, we must have hope (which perhaps will be false) that hell does not exist.

Author Biography

  • Mirosław Pawliszyn

    Mirosław Pawliszyn CSsR – wykłada filozofię na Uniwersytecie Warmińsko-Mazurskim w Olsztynie oraz w seminarium duchownym redemptorystów w Tuchowie. Redaktor naczelny rocznika naukowego „Studia Redemptorystowskie” oraz pisma internetowego „Człowiek-Kultura-Przyszłość”. Zainteresowania naukowe: filozofia religii, metafizyka, filozofia
    rosyjska, filozofia śmierci.

Issue cover

Downloads

Published

2013-12-31

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2013)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Mirosław Pawliszyn

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The following rules apply to copyright:

1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

  • to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
  • to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
  • to include the work in a compilation;
  • the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses  Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
3. The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the license Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorizes all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:
  • the author and the title of the work will be listed,
  • the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
  • the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
  • no derivative works will be created.

 The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.

If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]