Dianoia w Etykach Arystotelesa

Wojciech Kleofas Gródek

doi:10.15633/lie.3432

Dianoia in Aristotle’s Ethics

Authors

Wojciech Kleofas Gródek Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3432

Keywords:

lo, goj – reason, dia, noia – discursive thinking, proai, resij – purposive choice, commitment, e`kou, sion – voluntary, ovrqo.j lo, goj – correct reason

Abstract

The article attempts to shed light on the meaning of the term dianoia in Aristotle’s Ethics. The analysis of Aristotle’s texts leads to the conclusion that dianoia is the application of thinking (to noein) of being (to einai). Therefore dianoia is the act of affirmation (kataphasis), “that it is,” or negation (apophasis), “that it is not.” Considering the fact that dianoia is the property of the soul containing logos, Aristotle wonders what is his [her] meaning for human action (praxis). The term dianoia plays an important role in Aristotle’s account of purposive choice (prohairesis) and voluntary action (hekousion). In case of purposive choice, which is the cause of action, the dianoia grants reason (logos), if it affirms the proposition, and denies reason, if it negates. The action, whether good or bad, has to be voluntary. The action is voluntary, if it is action through oneself (eph’ heauton). This is possible through thinking (dianoian). Voluntary action can be good through practical wisdom (phronesis), which is intellectual virtue. Such action is therefore in accordance with the correct reason (kata ton orthon logon).

Author Biography

Wojciech Kleofas Gródek, Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

Wojciech Kleofas Gródek OFM – doktor, p.o. kierownika Katedry Historii Filozofii Starożytnej i Średniowiecznej Wydziału Filozoficznego UPJPII w Krakowie. Członek zarządu Towarzystwa Metafizycznego im. A. N. Whiteheada. Zajmuje się wczesną filozofią grecką, w szczególności szkołą eleacką.

References

Aristoteles Graece, ex rec. I. Bekkeri, vol. 1–2, Berolini 1831; wydanie drugie, poprawione: Aristoteles Graece, ed. O. Gigon, Berolini 1960.

Aristoteles latine interpretibus variis, ed. Academia Regia Borussica, Berolini 1831.

Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, przekł. D. Gromska, Warszawa 1982.

Arystoteles, Dzieła wszystkie, t. 7: Słownik terminów Arystotelesowych, ułożył K. Narecki, Warszawa 1994.

Arystoteles, Etyka wielka. Etyka eudemejska, przekł. W. Wróblewski, Warszawa 1977.

Belfiore E., Aristotle’s concept of praxis in the „Poetics”, „The Classical Journal” 79 (Dec., 1983 – Jan., 1984) no. 2, s. 110–124.

Burnet J., On the meaning of LOGOS in Aristotle’s „Ethics”, „The Classical Review” 28 (1914) no. 1, s. 6–7.

Chamberlain Ch., The Meaning of Prohairesis in Aristotle’s Ethics, „Transactons of the American Philological Association” 114 (1984), s. 147–157.

Charles D., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action, London 1984.

Diels H., Kranz W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, vol. 2, Weidmann 1989.

Gottlieb P., Aristotle on Dividing the Soul and Uniting the Virtues, „Phronesis” 39 (1994) no. 3, s. 275–290.

Heinaman R., The „Eudemian Ethics” on Knowledge and Voluntary Action, „Phronesis” 31 (1986) no. 2, s. 128–124.

Kenny A. J. P., Aristotle’s Theory of the Will, New Haven 1979.

Rabinoff E., Perception in Aristotle’s Ethics, Northwestern University Press 2018.

Smith A. D., Character and Intellect in Aristotle’s Ethics, „Phronesis” 41 (1996) no. 1, s. 56–74.

Downloads

PDF (Polish)

Published

2019-11-15

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

The following rules apply to copyright:

1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
to include the work in a compilation;
the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland

3. The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the license Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorizes all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:

the author and the title of the work will be listed,
the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
no derivative works will be created.

The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.

If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]