What If… One Tried Not to Commit a Naturalistic Fallacy?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3433Keywords:
metaethics, George Edward Moore, naturalistic fallacy, avoidance of naturalistic fallacy, interpersonal communicationAbstract
The paper discusses possible consequences of avoiding naturalistic fallacy (NF) in interpersonal communication. The hypothetical conversation between two subjects (X and Y) about an object (α) is outlined and its variants are specified. In the variant 1, X states that α is good and Y asks question, why it is good. X says that α is good, because, e.g., it is economically effective. This can be regarded, according to basically understood Moore’s view, as an instance of NF. In the variant 2, X avoids answering the Y’s question. X is saying only ‘α is good and that’s it!’, which can be interpreted as a reference to Moorean self-evidence category. Although X avoids NF, it impairs a conversation. One can also avoid NF through: not asking ‘why α is good?’ (variant 3) or not using word ‘good’ (variant 4). Analysis of all variants shows that avoiding NF can have troublesome consequences because of, i.a., common use of the word ‘good’ or frequent need to justify statements about goodness of some object. Those consequences seem to be independent from the mere evaluation of Moore’s argumentation about NF, e.g., a controversy whether NF is a real fallacy or only a consequence of Moore’s assumptions regarding, i.a., definitions.
References
Allen G. O., From the „Naturalistic Fallacy” to the Ideal Observer Theory, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 30 (1970) no. 4, s. 533–549.
Baldwin T., G. E. Moore. The Arguments of the Philosophers, London 1999.
Baumrin B. H., Is There a Naturalistic Fallacy?, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 5 (1968) no. 2, s. 79–89.
Brożek A., Błąd naturalistyczny z metodologicznego punktu widzenia, w: A. Brożek, B. Brożek, J. Stelmach, Fenomen normatywności, Kraków 2013, s. 153–177.
Bruening W. H., Moore and „Is-Ought”, „Ethics” 81 (1971) no. 2, s. 143–149.
Clark P., The Meaning of „Good’ and the Possibility of Value, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 108 (2002) no. 1/2, s. 31–38.
Diggs B. J., On Defining „Good”, „The Journal of Philosophy” 54 (1957) no. 15, s. 457–466.
Edel A., Further on Good and Its Structure, „The Journal of Philosophy” 27 (1930) no. 26, s. 701–708.
Fisher J. J., On Defining Good, „The Journal of Philosophy” 51 (1954) no. 23, s. 730–736.
Frankena W. K., The Naturalistic Fallacy, „Mind. New Series” 48 (1939) no. 192, s. 464–477.
Gauthier D. P., Moore’s Naturalistic Fallacy, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 4 (1967) no. 4, s. 315–320.
Geiger G. R., A Note on the Naturalistic Fallacy, „Philosophy of Science” 16 (1949) no. 4, s. 336–342.
Glassen P., Moore and the Indefinability of Good, „The Journal of Philosophy” 55 (1958) no. 10, s. 430–435.
Hartman R. S., The Definition of Good: Moore’s Axiomatic of the Science of Ethics, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series” 65 (1964–1965), s. 235–256.
Hutchinson B., G. E. Moore’s Ethical Theory. Resistance and Reconciliation, Cambridge 2004.
Jedynak S., Błąd naturalistyczny, „Etyka” 2 (1967), s. 289–297.
Jurkiewicz J., Byt a powinność jako relacja egzystencjalna i formalno-analityczna, „Czasopismo Filozoficzne” 6 (2010), s. 13–32.
Kolnai A., The Ghost of the Naturalistic Fallacy, „Philosophy” 55 (1980) no. 211, s. 5–16.
Kovesi J., „Principia Ethica” Re-examined: The Ethics of a Proto-logical Atomism, „Philosophy” 59 (1984) no. 228, s. 157–170.
Kurek Ł., Naturalistic Fallacy, „Polish Law Review” 3 (2017) no. 1, s. 242–258.
Kurek Ł., Zarzut błędu naturalistycznego i jego wpływ na dwudziestowieczną metaetykę, w: Naturalizm prawniczy. Stanowiska, red. J. Stelmach, B. Brożek, Ł. Kurek, K. Eliasz, Warszawa 2015, s. 94–111.
Lewy C., G. E. Moore on the Naturalistic Fallacy, w: G. E. Moore. Essays in Retrospect, ed. A. Ambrose, M. Lazerowitz, London 1970, s. 292–303.
Miller A., Contemporary Metaethics. An Introduction, Cambridge 20132.
Moore G. E., Zasady etyki, tłum. C. Znamierowski, Warszawa 2003.
Niemczuk A., Błąd teoretyzmu w aksjologii, „Kultura i Wartości” 3 (2012), s. 7–35.
Nielsen K., Covert and Overt Synonymity: Brandt and Moore and the „Naturalistic Fallacy”, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 25 (1974) no. 1, s. 51–56.
Shaw W. H., Moore on Right and Wrong. The Normative Ethics of G. E. Moore, Dordrecht 1995.
Solomon J., Is the Conception of „Good” Undefinable?, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series” 6 (1905–1906), s. 128–140.
Stratton-Lake P., G. E. Moore: „Principia Ethica”, w: Central Works of Philosophy Volume 4. The Twentieth Century: Moore to Popper, ed. J. Shand, Chesham 2006, s. 20–37.
Sylvester R. P., The Moral Philosophy of G. E. Moore, ed. R. Perkins, Jr., R. W. Sleeper, Philadelphia 1990.
Williams D. C., The Definition of Yellow and of Good, „The Journal of Philosophy” 27 (1930) no. 19, s. 515–527.
Williams D. C., The Meaning of „Good”, „The Philosophical Review” 46 (1937) no. 4, s. 416–423.
Załuski W., Błąd naturalistyczny, w: Studia z filozofii prawa, t. 2, red. J. Stelmach, Kraków 2003, s. 111–121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
