Man and the natural world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3472Keywords:
environmental ethics, biocentrism, species egalitarianismAbstract
The paper takes up Paul W. Taylor’s theses (beliefs) concerning the relations between human beings and the environment. First thesis sets forth that humans are members of the Earth community of life; second, humans are interrelated with other species; third, all organisms are teleological centers of life tending to fulfill their inner good; fourth, humans are equal with other living creatures. These theses are analyzed in-depth and critically assessed. Most controversial is the last belief. It implies that all living creatures have the same value and should be treated equally. The paper shows that these assertions are not viable. More realistic is the idea that natural living creatures differ as far as their values are concerned. Hence, in the paper is undertaken an attempt to figure out a method of disclosing these axiological differences, starting from a personalist model describing mutual relations between anthropology and ethics.
References
Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, trans. D. Gromska, Warszawa 2000.
Callicott J. B., Environmental Ethics, [in:] Encyclopedia of Bioethics, ed. S. G. Post, vol. 2, New York 2003, pp. 757–776.
Galewicz W., O dobru drzew i ekologicznej reformie utylitaryzmu, [in:] Świadomość środowiska, ed. W. Galewicz, Krakow 2006.
Lee P., George R. P., Body-Self Dualism on Contemporary Ethics and Politics, New York 2008.
Merecki J., Naturalizm etyczny. Błąd naturalistyczny, [in:] Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii, ed. A. Maryniarczyk, vol. 7, Lublin 2006.
Schmidtz D., Are All Species Equal?, [in:] Environmental Ethics. What really Matters, What really Works, ed. D. Schmidtz, E. Willott, New York 2002.
Styczeń T., Antropologia a etyka, [in:] T. Styczeń, W drodze do etyki, Lublin 1984, pp. 121–130.
Taylor P. W., Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton 1986.
Taylor P. W., The Ethics of Respect for Nature, „Environmental Ethics”, vol. 3, 1981, pp. 197–218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Grzegorz Hołub
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
