Between an Object and a Person:  an Inverted Image / Icon

Una Popović

doi:10.15633/lie.4166

Between an Object and a Person: an Inverted Image / Icon

Authors

Una Popović University of Novi Sad, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.4166

Keywords:

object, person, icons, latreia, proskynesis

Abstract

Relations between persons in the contemporary world often resemble those of the same persons towards objects. We are accustomed to ‘use’ – and even see – others as if they are, to put it in Kantian terms, merely a means to an end, and not as if they are an end in themselves. Such blurring of lines between objects and persons surely has significant moral and political consequences. However, in this paper I reach instead for a very traditional example and suggest it as a possible model for understanding these contemporary issues. I’d like to offer an analysis of icons, with regard to the concepts of latreia (worship) and proskynesis (devotion), developed and discussed in the Byzantine empire during the era of iconoclasm. By revisiting this old quarrel, I wish to invert the issue of persons becoming (like) objects, since in the case of the icons the question is whether an object can and should be treated as a person. Such an inverted image could, in my opinion, offer us a new perspective on contemporary intersubjective relations and present us with a double optic, which can teach us to distinguish between esteem for objects and respect for persons.

Author Biography

Una Popović, University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Una Popović is an associate professor at the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, where she has been a faculty member since 2009; she also teaches at the Academy of Arts, University of Novi Sad. She teaches courses on Medieval Philosophy, Modern Philosophy, Logic, Philosophy of Mathematics, and Philosophy of Art. Una Popović completed BA studies in philosophy at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, in 2008. She has a PhD in philosophy (aesthetics, ontology) by the same University (2014); thesis titled Heidegger’s Philosophy of Language.
Una Popović is a member of the executive committee of the Aesthetic Society of Serbia and Serbian Philosophical Society. Her research interests lie in philosophy of language, philosophy of art and phenomenology; recently she is working on projects concerning Baumgarten’s idea of aesthetics, aesthetics of dance, and image-word relationship in medieval philosophy.

References

Ando C., Signs, Idols, and the Incarnation in Augustinian Metaphysics, “Representations” (2001) No. 1, pp. 24–53.

Augustine, De Doctrina Christiana, Oxford 1995.

Bell M., On the Virtue of Taking Oneself Lightly, in: Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 9, ed. M. Timmons, Oxford 2019.

Besancon A., The Forbidden Image: An Intellectual History of Iconoclasm, Chicago 2000.

Brubaker L., Haldon J., Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era, C. 680–850: A History, Cambridge 2011.

Chisolm R.M., Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study, London 2013.

John of Damascus, Treatise III, in: Three Treatises on the Divine Images, New York 2003.

Ferraris M., Art as Document, in: Wittgenstein and Aesthetics: Perspectives and Debates, eds. A. Arbo, M. Le Du, S. Plaud, Frankfurt am Main 2012.

Herrin J., Byzantium: The Surprising Life of a Medieval Empire, Princeton 2009.

Horkheimer M., Critique of Instrumental Reason, London 2013.

Irwin T., Ethics Through History: An Introduction, Oxford 2020.

Jay M., Reason After Its Eclipse: On Late Critical Theory, Madison 2016.

Karahan A., Byzantine Iconoclasm: Ideology and Quest for Power, in: Iconoclasm from Antiquity to Modernity, eds. K. Kolrud, M. Prusac, Farnham 2014, pp.75–94.

Kenny D.A., Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis, New York 1994.

Levinson J., Aesthetics and Ethics. Essays at the Intersection, Cambridge 1998.

Lucas P., Ethics and Self-Knowledge: Respect for Self-Interpreting Agents, Dordrecht 2011.

Mango C., The Art of The Byzantine Empire 312–1453. Sources and Documents, Toronto 2004.

Mondzain M.-J., Image, Icon, Economy: The Byzantine Origins of the Contemporary Imaginary, Stanford 2005.

Rees D.H., The Postsecular Political Philosophy of Jürgen Habermas: Translating the Sacred, Cardiff 2018.

Stern N., Ecological Aesthetics: artful tactics for humans, nature, and politics, Darmouth 2018.

Tamen M., Kinds of Persons, Kinds of Rights, Kinds of Bodies, “Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature” 10 (1998) No. 1, pp. 1–32.

West D., Object Thinking, Redmond 2004.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-16

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

The following rules apply to copyright:

1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
to include the work in a compilation;
the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland

3. The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the license Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorizes all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:

the author and the title of the work will be listed,
the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
no derivative works will be created.

The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.

If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]