On the relation between the philosophy of science and jurisprudence in the context of the naturalization of law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.800Keywords:
naturalism in legal philosophy, philosophy of science, legal theory, legal realism, epistemic valueAbstract
This paper concerns the relation between contemporary jurisprudence and the philosophy of science. The modern naturalistic approach to law seems very important. In the context of the recent rapid development of the empirical sciences concerning human behavior, legal issues may be seen from new perspective. The realistic movement in legal philosophy is one of the most sophisticated, although at first impression it may seem different. The consequence of such an empirical approach is that jurisprudence becomes a purely descriptive discipline. Also many problems regarding the philosophy of science, in particular the controversy regarding the epistemic value of scientific statements, gains a new significance for the philosophy of law. These are discussed in this paper.References
Holmes O., The path of the law, „Harvard Law Review” 1987 vol. 10 no. 8.
Motyka K., Petrażycki Leon, [w:] Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu [wersja internetowa: http://www.ptta.pl/pef/pdf/p/petrazycki.pdf].
Petrażycki L., Wstęp do nauki prawa i moralności [w:] tenże, O nauce, prawie i moralności: pisma wybrane, Warszawa 1985.
Ross A., Tȗ-Tȗ, „Harvard Law Review” 1957 vol. 70.
Ross A., Directives and norms, London 1968.
Stelmach J., Sarkowicz R., Filozofia prawa XIX I XX wieku, Kraków 1999.
Hart H. L. A., Scandinavian realism, „The Cambridge Law Journal” 1959 vol. 17 no. 2.
Załuski W., Game theory in jurisprudence, Kraków 2013.
Bjarup J., The philosophy of scandinavian legal realism, „Ratio Juris” 2005 vol. 18.
Brożek B., Some remarks on the naturalization of law, Kraków 2010 (Studies in the Philosophy of Law, V).
Brożek B., Normatywność prawa. Szkic teorii (tekst dostępny na: http://biolawgy.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/normatywnosc.pdf).
Petrażycki L., O pobudkach postępowania i o istocie moralności i prawa, Warszawa 1924, s. 30–31.
Dalberg-Larsen J., Alf Ross and the sociology of law, „Scandinavian Studies In Law” 2005 vol. 48.
Leiter B., Naturalism In Legal Philosophy [w:] Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Stanford 2012, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism/> (30.01.2014).
Llewellyn K., Some realism about realism: Responding to Dean Pound, „Harvard Law Review” 1931 vol. 44 no. 8.
Heller M., Przeciw fundacjonizmowi, [w:] tenże, Filozofia i wszechświat, Kraków 2006.
Reed B., How to think about fallibilism, „Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition” 2002 vol. 107 no. 2.
Hawking S., Wielki Projekt, przeł. J. Włodarczyk, Warszawa 2011.
Haack S., Kolenda K., Two fallibilists in search of the truth, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes” 1977 vol. 51.
Popper K., Open society and its enemies, Princeton 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Marek Jakubiec
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
