Harmonie and synapsis in the thought of Heraclitus

Authors

  • Wojciech Kleofas Gródek Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.1798

Keywords:

compatibility, combination, a being brought together, a being brought apart, back­‑turning, opposed, bow, order, whole, in harmony, out of harmony, one, everything, word

Abstract

The article attempts to shed light on the meaning of the terms harmonie and synapsis. The motivation for this attempt is the fact that two further terms, sympheron and diapheron, were used in the context of the original two. It might seem that the use of similar terms suggests a similar meaning. Our analyses demonstrated, however, that Heraclitus refers the two terms to different events. In case of harmonie it is the compatibility of two radically opposing elements, whose nature is captured by the phrase in sentence B8, namely: to antiksun. In case of synapsis it is the combination of two elements, i.e. a certain common element, for instance a shared border. The fact that the terms sympheron and diapheron are used to describe both of them may be result of the Heraclitus’ search for a rule (gnome) that rules everything. It may bring a possibility of referring to logos in a direct way.

Author Biography

  • Wojciech Kleofas Gródek, Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
    Doktor filozofii, p. o. kierownika katedry Historii Filozofii Starożytnej i Średniowiecznej Wy­działu Filozoficznego Uniwersytetu Pa­pies­kiego Jana Paw­ła II w Krakowie. Członek zarządu Towarzystwa Metafizycznego im. A. N. White­heada. Zajmuje się wczesną filo­zofią grecką, w szczególności szkołą eleacką.

References

Aristoteles graece, ed. I. Bekker, vol. 1 i 2, Berolini 1831. Editio altera quam curavit Olof Gigon, Berolini 1960.

Colli G., La sagesse grecque, t. 3, Combas 1992.

Diels H., Kranz W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Weidmann 1989.

Emlyn­‑Jones C. J., Heraclitus and the identity of opposites, „Phronesis” 21 (1976), s. 89–114.

Kahn Ch. H., II. A new look at Heraclitus, “American Philological Quarterly” 1 (1964) no. 3, s. 189–203.

Homeri Odyssea, eds. W. Dindorf, C. Hentze, pars I, Lipsiea 1931.

Kirk G. S., Raven J. E., Schofield M., Filozofia przedsokratejska, przekł. J. Lang, Warszawa 1999.

Krokiewicz A., Zarys filozofii greckiej, Warszawa 2000.

Marcovich M., Heraclitus: Greek text with a short commentary, Merida 1967.

Mrówka K., Heraklit, Warszawa 2004.

Platonis dialogi, ed. I. Bekker, p. II, vol. 1, Berolini 1817.

Plutarchi Chaeronensis Scripta moralia, ed. A. F. Didot, Parisiis 1841.

Porphyrius De Antro Nympharum, ed. C. Gesner, Traiecti ad Rhenum 1765.

Poster C., The task of the bow: Heraclitus’ rhetorical critique of epic language, “Philosophy & Rhetoric” 39 (2006), s. 1–21.

Shipton K. M. W., Heraclitus fr. 10: a musical interpretation, „Phronesis” 30 (1985) ­issue 2, s. 111–130.

Snell B., Heraklits Fragment 10, „Hermes” 76 (1941), s. 84–87.

Snyder J. M., The harmonia of bow and lyre in Heraclitus Fr. 51 (DK), „Phronesis” 29 (1984), s. 91–95.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

11-20 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.