Two Formal Models of the Concept of Temperance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.2347Keywords:
Aristotelian ethics, Epicurean ethics, golden mean, temperance, conceptual analysis, logical analysis, formal modelsAbstract
Temperance is one of the four cardinal virtues which were first formulated by Plato. Today the notion of temperance has a central position in many ethical systems, especially in ecophilosophy (environmental philosophy). Temperance, involwing balance and moderation, may give resolution to many contemporary human problems. The attempt of analysis of this concept with simple formal means can make clear some hidden assumptions and the structure of the concept of temperance. The analised concept includes both – a decision (a choice) and an action/behaviour as an effect of the decision. First model is based on Aristotle’s theory of golden mean presented in his Nicomachean Ethics. The attempt of reconstruction Aristotle’s idea using mathematical notion of weighted mean shows that the concept of temperance is strongly restricted to the cultural background. Therefore in extremal cases the universal concept of temperance may not exist.
Second model given by Epicurus is based on the notion of consequence. It concerns pleasure and pain only, but temperance is just recommended in using pleasures. The set of temperant decisions is built recurently. A – the set of pleasure – is modified step by step by consequence CR(A) where R – set of rules – includes modus ponens, law of identity and some simple laws of everyday provenience. U is the set of temperant choices in Epicurean sense iff ∀p ∈ P, ~(p ∈ CR (U)) where P – set of pain.
References
Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, przeł. D. Gromska, Warszawa 1982.
Św. Ambroży z Mediolanu, Wykład Ewangelii według św. Łukasza, przeł. W. Szołdrski, oprac. i wstęp A. M. Bogucki OP, Warszawa 1977.
Św. Augustyn, Pisma monastyczne, tłum. P. Nehring, M. Starowieyski, R. Szaszka, Kraków 2002.
Czeżowski T., Pisma z etyki i teorii wartości, Wrocław–Warszawa 1989.
Diogenes Laertios, Żywoty i poglądy słynnych filozofów, przeł. I. Krońska i in., Warszawa 1984.
Epikur, List do Menoikeusa, przeł. K. Leśniak, w: Diogenes Laertios, Żywoty i poglądy słynnych filozofów, przeł. I. Krońska i in., Warszawa 1984, s. 643–650.
Rodriguez Luño A., Elegidos en Cristo para ser santos, vol. 3: Moral especial, Roma 2008.
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu, Summa teologiczna, t. 22: Umiarkowanie, tłum. ks. S. Bełch, Londyn 1963.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
