The twilight of the masters and the dawn of idols. Father Bocheński’s theory of authority
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3938Keywords:
Józef Maria Bocheński, authority, Aristotle, mutual love, congenial companion, technologyAbstract
A phenomenon of authority is one of the most important in social life but the concept of authority is at the same time one of the most difficult in theoretical perspective. Against the background of extensive literature about this problem an essay by J. M. Bocheński entitled What is authority? written in 1974 constitutes a masterpiece. In his analysis Bocheński puts forward as many as 88 theses in metaphysics of a man characterizing the authority. The main thesis says that “every authority is both epistemic and deontic one.” Although this thesis is doubtful, the reasoning of Bocheński is very clear and it opens the door for construction of theory of authority.
Author of this paper claims that authorities in general may be divided into personal and institutional ones. Personal authorities in turn split into fraternal and sectarian. Fraternal personal authority is a “mutual love between unequal persons.” This very basic category had been already distinguished by Aristotle. This type of authority is always of epistemic-deontic character. Such pattern of behaviors is also present in India and China, but it has been underestimated by Bocheński.
In the contemporary Western world we experience the “collapse of authorities.” In other words, the “false authorities dominate.” This means that we lack fraternal ones, namely the masters. In their place we have a plethora of sectarian authorities and idol-fan type of relations. Fall of authorities constitutes a result of technological advancement that ultimately altered the condition of human existence, thus complicating our recognition of congenial companions.
References
Aforyzmy chińskie, tł. M. J. Künstler, Warszawa 1977.
Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, tł. D. Gromska, Warszawa 1996.
Bocheński J. M., Co to jest autorytet?, w: J. M. Bocheński, Logika i filozofia. Wybór pism, Warszawa 1993, s. 187– 324.
Bocheński J. M., Sto zabobonów. Krótki filozoficzny słownik zabobonów, Kraków 1994.
Clements J., Konfucjusz, tł. A. Mazurska, Warszawa 2007.
Dostojewski F., Bracia Karamazow, przeł. A. Wat, Warszawa 1984.
Fleck L., Psychosocjologia poznania naukowego, Lublin 2006.
Tasak A., Autorytet władzy – władza autorytetu. Autorytety w polskiej przestrzeni publicznej, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Crakoviensis. Studia Politologica” 15 (2015), s. 193–204.
Tuziak B., Autorytet jako zjawisko społeczne. Wymiar lokalny, „Studia Socjologiczne” 197 (2010) nr 2, s. 53–88.
Weber M., Szkice z socjologii religii, tł. J. Prokopiuk i H. Wandowski, Warszawa 1984.
Wolniewicz B., Filozofia Suszki, w: B. Wolniewicz, Filozofia i wartości, III, Warszawa 2003, s. 63–72.
Wolniewicz B., Wstęp do filozofii. Wykład dla studentów I roku Instytutu Filozofii UW w roku akad. 1985/86 (spisał Paweł Okołowski), „Edukacja Filozoficzna” 64 (2017), s. 161–219.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).