On Three Types of Empathy: the Perfect, the Truncated, and the Contaminated

Authors

  • Wojciech Załuski Jagiellonian University in Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.2361

Keywords:

affective empathy, cognitive empathy, empathic action, pseudo-empathy

Abstract

In the paper a distinction is made between perfect empathy, truncated empathy, and contaminated empathy. Perfect empathy is defined as the combination of three elements: cognitive empathy (the capacity for a comprehensive and ethically proper understanding of other people’s emotions), affective empathy (the tendency to emotionally respond to other people’s emotions in an adequate way: sorrow to sorrow, and joy to joy), and a tendency to undertake an ethically proper action (e.g., to relieve the sufferer’s pain) as a result of the emotional response to other people’s emotions. The phrase ‘ethically proper’ in the above definitions shows that perfect empathy is not a free-standing ethical capacity. An empathic emotional reaction and empathic action are justified only if they are based on the comprehensive and the ethically proper understanding of the other person’s emotion, i.e., the understanding which enables one to assess whether this emotion is justified by its causes. But such an understanding is impossible without a sense of justice, or more generally, without the knowledge of ethical rules which say in what
circumstances an emotion of sorrow or joy is justifiable, and, additionally, what action is ethically proper in a given situation. Truncated empathy, which may take various forms, lacks one of the free elements of perfect empathy. Finally, contaminated empathy arises by admixing one of the four following amoral or non-moral elements to perfect or truncated empathy, namely: thankfulness at the contrast between our fortune and the sufferer’s misfortune; the feeling of anxiety, arising at the sight of the sufferer’s misfortune, about our own good future; the unpleasant feeling of distress, arising at the sight of the sufferer’s sorrow; or pity.

Author Biography

  • Wojciech Załuski, Jagiellonian University in Kraków
    Wojciech Załuski – prof. dr hab., filozof i prawnik, specjalizuje się w etyce i filozofii prawa; pracuje w Katedrze Filozofii Prawa i Etyki Prawniczej na Wydziale Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w Krakowie.

References

Baron-Cohen S., The Science of Evil. On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty, New York

Batson C. D., The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-Psychological Answer, New York

Broad C. B., Five Types of Ethical Theory, London 1930, http://www.ditext.com/broad/

ftet/ftet.html (20.06.2017).

Buber M., Je et tu, transl. G. Bianquis, Paris 2012.

Cartwright D. E., Schopenhauer’s Compassion and Nietzsche’s Pity, “Schopenhauer Jahrbuch” 69 (1988), p. 557–567.

Hoffman M. L., Empatia i rozwój moralny [Empathy and Moral Development. Implications for Caring and Justice], transl. O. Waśkiewicz, Gdańsk 2006.

Mercer P., Sympathy and Ethics, Oxford 1972.

Nietzsche F., The Gay Science, transl. W. Kaufmann, New York 1974.

Nietzsche F., Daybreak, transl. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge 1982.

Nozick R., The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations, New York 1990.

Nussbaum M., Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Scheler M., Istota i formy sympatii [Wesen und Formen der Sympathie], transl. A. Węgrzecki, Warszawa 1980.

Slote M., The Ethics of Care and Empathy, London–New York 2007.

Smith A., Theory of Moral Sentiments, New York 2007.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

Issue

Vol. 46 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

The following rules apply to copyright:

1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.

2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:

  • to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
  • to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
  • to include the work in a compilation;
  • the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses  Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
3. The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow makes the work available on the Journals Platform belonging to the University, according to the license Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland. Accordingly, the author authorizes all interested parties to use the work on the following conditions:
  • the author and the title of the work will be listed,
  • the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
  • the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
  • no derivative works will be created.

 The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.

If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]