Pleasure and good in Plato’s Protagoras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3936Keywords:
h`donh, – pleasure, avgaqo, n – good, evpisth, mh – knowledge, metrhtikh. te, cnh – art of measuring, swthri, a – preservationAbstract
The article attempts to explain why Plato in his Protagoras promotes the idea – expressed in this dialogue by Socrates – that pleasure (hedone) is good (agathon). The scholars are not unanimous in their assessment of the thesis and its justification by Socrates. Furthermore, it seems to be in conflict with what Plato expresses in other dialogues. Some commentators maintain that it is the actual view of Socrates or of Plato from the time when the dialogue was written. Other say that this thesis is actually the premise for another thesis, namely that virtue is knowledge. An opinion was also voiced that only a cursory reading of Protagoras might lead one to the opinion that Socrates treats the relationship between pleasure and good seriously. However, if he doesn’t, then why does he attempt to convince his interlocutors to believe it? Taking all that into concern, an attempt was made to analyze the text in order to determine whether specific characteristics of good that lead to its relationship with pleasure are mentioned there. An important point in Socrates’ justification of that relationship is his explanation of what should direct one’s actions if one want to feel pleasure throughout one’s life and to avoid illusions that might lead to the belief that pleasure is bad. Such analyses lead to the conclusion that self-control plays the key role in achieving the state of pleasure throughout the whole of one’s life.
References
Aristoteles Graece, ex rec. I. Bekkeri, vol. 2, Berolini 1831. Wydanie drugie, poprawione: Aristoteles Graece, ed. O. Gigon, Berolini 1960.
Balaban O., Plato and Protagoras. Truth and Relativism in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Lexington Books 1999.
Goodell T. D., Plato’s Hedonism, „The American Journal of Philology” 42 (1921) No. 1, s. 25–39.
Hackforth R., Hedonism in Plato’s Protagoras, „Classical Quarterly” 22 (1928), s. 39–42.
Kahn Ch. H., Platon i dialog sokratyczny, tłum. M. Filipczuk, Warszawa 2018.
Pacewicz A., Hedone. Koncepcja przyjemności w filozofii Platona, Wrocław 2016.
Plato, Philebus, w: Platonis Opera, vol. 2, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1910.
Plato, Protagoras, w: Platonis Opera, vol. 3, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1909.
Plato, Respublica, w: Platonis Opera, vol. 4, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1905.
Plato, Theaetetus, w: Platonis Opera, vol. 1, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1905.
Sullivan J. P., The Hedonism in Plato’s „Protagoras”, „Phronesis” 6 (1961) No. 1, s. 10–28.
Zeyl D. J., Socrates and Hedonism: „Protagoras” 351b-358d, „Phronesis” 25 (1980) No. 3, s. 250–269.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).