The twilight of the masters and the dawn of idols. Father Bocheński’s theory of authority
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3938Keywords:
Józef Maria Bocheński, authority, Aristotle, mutual love, congenial companion, technologyAbstract
A phenomenon of authority is one of the most important in social life but the concept of authority is at the same time one of the most difficult in theoretical perspective. Against the background of extensive literature about this problem an essay by J. M. Bocheński entitled What is authority? written in 1974 constitutes a masterpiece. In his analysis Bocheński puts forward as many as 88 theses in metaphysics of a man characterizing the authority. The main thesis says that “every authority is both epistemic and deontic one.” Although this thesis is doubtful, the reasoning of Bocheński is very clear and it opens the door for construction of theory of authority.
Author of this paper claims that authorities in general may be divided into personal and institutional ones. Personal authorities in turn split into fraternal and sectarian. Fraternal personal authority is a “mutual love between unequal persons.” This very basic category had been already distinguished by Aristotle. This type of authority is always of epistemic-deontic character. Such pattern of behaviors is also present in India and China, but it has been underestimated by Bocheński.
In the contemporary Western world we experience the “collapse of authorities.” In other words, the “false authorities dominate.” This means that we lack fraternal ones, namely the masters. In their place we have a plethora of sectarian authorities and idol-fan type of relations. Fall of authorities constitutes a result of technological advancement that ultimately altered the condition of human existence, thus complicating our recognition of congenial companions.
References
Aforyzmy chińskie, tł. M. J. Künstler, Warszawa 1977.
Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, tł. D. Gromska, Warszawa 1996.
Bocheński J. M., Co to jest autorytet?, w: J. M. Bocheński, Logika i filozofia. Wybór pism, Warszawa 1993, s. 187– 324.
Bocheński J. M., Sto zabobonów. Krótki filozoficzny słownik zabobonów, Kraków 1994.
Clements J., Konfucjusz, tł. A. Mazurska, Warszawa 2007.
Dostojewski F., Bracia Karamazow, przeł. A. Wat, Warszawa 1984.
Fleck L., Psychosocjologia poznania naukowego, Lublin 2006.
Tasak A., Autorytet władzy – władza autorytetu. Autorytety w polskiej przestrzeni publicznej, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Crakoviensis. Studia Politologica” 15 (2015), s. 193–204.
Tuziak B., Autorytet jako zjawisko społeczne. Wymiar lokalny, „Studia Socjologiczne” 197 (2010) nr 2, s. 53–88.
Weber M., Szkice z socjologii religii, tł. J. Prokopiuk i H. Wandowski, Warszawa 1984.
Wolniewicz B., Filozofia Suszki, w: B. Wolniewicz, Filozofia i wartości, III, Warszawa 2003, s. 63–72.
Wolniewicz B., Wstęp do filozofii. Wykład dla studentów I roku Instytutu Filozofii UW w roku akad. 1985/86 (spisał Paweł Okołowski), „Edukacja Filozoficzna” 64 (2017), s. 161–219.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
