Should We Want to See God More Clearly? A Sketch from the Axiology of the Phenomenology of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.60201Keywords:
phenomenology of religion, axiology, hiddenness, Blaise Pascal, Joseph RatzingerAbstract
In contemporary analytical philosophy of religion, there is a discussion devoted to the problem of divine hiddenness. The main question it raises is “why isn’t God more obvious?” This discussion has a part in common with the discussion going on under the heading “axiology of theism”. The main question is whether we should want God to exist. Situated at the intersection of these two discussions is the so-called “axiological answer to the problem of divine hiddenness”. This answer is contained in the statement that a world in which God is not fully manifest is better than a world in which God’s obviousness would be greater. In this article I will follow in the footsteps of the proponents of the “axiological answer” to the question of divine hiddenness. The subject of my interest will be the question “should we want to see God more clearly?” Thus, I will consider the problem, which can be classified in the area of the “axiology of the phenomenology of religion”. Guides on the way to finding an answer to this question will be analytical philosophers of religion, as well as Blaise Pascal and Joseph Ratzinger. I will take up the consideration of the epistemic situation in which “ordinary” human beings find themselves, and expand it to include a Christological thread. I will present arguments for the thesis that we should not want to see God more clearly.
References
Cullison A., Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 47 (2010) nr 2, s. 119–134.
Dobrzeniecki M., Ukrytość i Wcielenie. Teistyczna odpowiedź na argument Johna L. Schellenberga za nieistnieniem Boga, Kraków 2020.
Dumsday T., Anti-Theism and the Problem of Divine Hiddenness, „Sophia” 55 (2016) nr 2, s. 179–195.
Hendricks P., Lougheed K., Undermining the Axiological Solution to Divine Hiddenness, „International Journal for Philosophy of Religion” 86 (2019) nr 1 s. 3–15; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9693-y.
Hołda M., Źródło i noc. Wprowadzenie do współczesnego absconditeizmu, Kraków 2020.
Hick J., Evil and the God of Love, New York 2010.
Jan od Krzyża św., Droga na górę Karmel, tłum. B. Smyrak, Kraków 2010, s. 169–486.
Judycki S., Filozofia i chrystologia, „Analiza i Egzystencja” 10 (2009), s. 7–32.
Kahane G., Should We Want God to Exist?, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 82 (2010) nr 3, s. 674–696; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00426.x.
Kraay K., Invitation to the Axiology of Theism, w: K. Kraay, Does God Matter? Essays on the Axiological Consequences of Theism, New York 2018, s. 1–35.
Lougheed K., The Axiological Solution to Divine Hiddenness, „An International Journal of Analytical Philosophy” 31 (2018) nr 3, s. 331–341; https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12186.
Pascal B., Myśli, tłum. T. Boy-Żeleński, Gliwice 2019.
Pismo Święte Starego i Nowego Testamentu, Poznań 2007.
Ratiznger J./Benedykt XVI, Jezus z Nazaretu. Od wjazdu do Jerozolimy do Zmartwychwstania, tłum. W. Szymona, Kraków 2019.
Ratzinger J., O sensie bycia chrześcijaninem, tłum. J. Merecki, Kraków 2006.
Ratzinger J., Rozumienie Objawienia i teologia historii według Bonawentury. Rozprawa habilitacyjna i studia nad Bonawenturą, tłum. J. Merecki, Lublin 2014.
Rea M., The Hiddenness of God, Oxford 2018.
Schellenberg J., Argument z ukrytości, tłum. R. Mordarski, Bydgoszcz 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Miłosz Hołda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
