Faith – Reason: a Problematic Relationship? Theology as an Extension of Faith in Reason

Authors

  • Marcelo Javier Navarro Muñoz Liverpool Hope University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15633/ps.4065

Keywords:

faith, reason, Fides et ratio, fundamental theology

Abstract

In this article the author reviews the interrelationship between faith and reason in the steps of John Paul II’s Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio. He explores briefly historical circumstances following Etienne Gilson. Then, he introduces philosophical and theological considerations of Cornelio Fabro to do theology in the footsteps of Aquinas. From the perspective of Thomism of the Italian philosopher and by recalling the most urgent theological tasks for the third millennium as indicated in Fides et ratio, the author presents general guidelines for the circularity of faith and reason within the context of fundamental theology. Throughout this article he reads Fides et ratio specifically through the Fabrian lens to present a fresh perspective as a contribution to fundamental theology. Finally, he recalls the conclusive recommendation of John Paul II in the aforementioned letter so as to harmonize reason and faith within a Marian framework.

Author Biography

  • Marcelo Javier Navarro Muñoz, Liverpool Hope University
    Rev. Marcelo Javier Navarro Muñoz, IVE – is a professed member of the Institute of the Incarnate Word living in Fossanova Abbey (Italy); professor of Fundamental Theology at the Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen House of Formation in Maryland (US). Ph.D. at Maryvale Institute (Birmingham, UK) and Liverpool Hope University in 2020; doctoral thesis: The Epistemological Structure of the Act of Faith. The Contribution of the Intensive Thomism of ­Cornelio Fabro to Fundamental Theology.

References

Aquinas T., Expositio et lectura super epistolas Pauli Apostoli, vol. 3, Bologna 2006.

Billeci S., La riflessione teologica sulla religione nei principali trattati di Teologia fondamentale, “Ho Theologos” 34 (May 2016) no. 2, pp. 249–270.

Bonino S-T. OP, Théologie philosophique et intelligence de la foi, pp. 1–10, conference at the Pontifical University Santa Croce in Rome on November 25, 2016 at https://www.academia.edu (6.11.2020).

Contat A., Le figure della differenza ontologica nel tomismo del Novecento (I), “Alpha Omega” 11 (2008) N. 1, pp. 77–129.

Fabro C., Dall’essere all’esistente. Hegel. Kierkegaard, Heidegger e Jaspers, Genoa–Milano 2004.

Fabro C., Dio. Introduzione al problema teologico, Segni (RM) 2007.

Fabro C., Introduzione a San Tommaso. La metafisica tomista e il pensiero moderno, Segni (RM) 2016.

Fabro C., L’avventura della teologia progressista, Segni (RM) 2014.

Fabro C., Le Ragioni del Tomismo. Dopo il Centenario dell’Enciclica “Aeterni Patris”, eds. A. Livi, C. Fabro, F. Ocáriz, C. Vansteenkiste, Milano 1979.

Fontana E.C., Attualità del Tomismo di Cornelio Fabro, Roma 2007.

Gilson E., Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages, New York 1938.

Izquierdo C., The Circular Relationship between Philosophy and Theology: “Fides et Ratio 73”, “Scripta Theologica” 41 (2009) no. 2, p. 451–468.

John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et Ratio. On the Relationship between Faith and Reason, Boston 1998.

Karuvelil G., To Whom Am I Speaking? Communication, Culture, and Fundamental Theology, “Theological Studies” 76 (2015) no. 4, p. 675–697.

Navarro M., Father Cornelio Fabro: a model for the renewal of Catholic Theology, “The Incarnate Word Journal” 4 (2017) no. 2, p. 125–149.

Nichols A., OP, Conversation of Faith and Reason. Modern Catholic Thought from Hermes to Benedict XVI, Chicago 2009.

O’Collins G., Rethinking Fundamental Theology: Toward a New Fundamental Theology, New York 2011.

O’Collins G., Fundamental theology: The continuing debate, “Pacifica” 27 (2014) no. 1, p. 97–110.

Ormerod N., Faith and Reason: Perspectives from MacIntyre and Lonergan, “The Heythrop Journal” 46 (2005) no. 1, p. 11–22.

Pozzo G., La Manualistica, in: Storia della Teologia. Da Vitus Pichler a Henri de Lubac, vol. 3, ed. R. Fisichella, Rome 1996, p. 309–336.

Rowland T., Catholic Theology, London–New York 2017.

Strumia A., La fede e il risanamento della ragione come ragione, “Divus Thomas” 108 (2005) no. 1, p. 155–178.

Tanzella-Nitti G., La dimensione apologetica della Teologia fondamentale: una riflessione sul ruolo dei preambula fidei, “Annales Theologici” 18 (2007), p. 11–60.

Tanzella-Nitti G., Proposte e modelli di Teologia Fondamentale nell XX secolo, “Annales Theologici” 24 (2010) no. 1, p.175–238.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31

Issue

Section

Theological research

Similar Articles

71-80 of 194

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.