Sapientia – Scientia – Metafisica. Some Remarks on Stanisław Kamiński’s Text on Wisdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3687Keywords:
metaphysic, wisdom, metaphysical intuition, Stanisław KamińskiAbstract
Stanisław Kamiński, polish philosopher and methodologist of metaphysics, is an author of very interesting and inspiring text on wisdom. In his philosophical analysis we discover very important question not only of wisdom itself but also on our philosophical thinking. Wisdom is not just a set of human knowledge that man accumulates over the years of his activity in the world, even if it was knowledge supported by his scientific activity. Wisdom is not only the ability to cope in the world resulting from accumulated experience, resulting even from a long life of man. Wisdom is an in-depth knowledge of reality in its aspect of ultimate causes and goals. Wisdom is knowledge, metaphysical knowledge, the most basic, because the most grounded, because it reaches the very fundamental basis of existence, the real being, not only a notion of being. Wisdom is theoretical knowledge, which is the final and exhaustive understanding of the world, its most basic, deepest and eternal order. Practical wisdom is then the skill of practical, efficient and intelligent application of theoretical wisdom, which we apply in practice, in acting and creating our attitude towards the world and other people. At this point, one can finally refer to the title of the collection of methodological and metaphilosophical works of Stanisław Kamiński, from which comes his fundamental work on wisdom – Science and philosophy, and wisdom – which reads: How to philosophize? “To achieve wisdom,” answers Stanisław Kamiński.
References
Anzelm z Canterbury, Monologion. Proslogion, tłum. T. Włodarczyk, Warszawa 1992.
Arystoteles, Metafizyka, tłum. T. Żeleźnik, Lublin 1998.
Kamiński S., Czy możliwe są ogólne i konieczne twierdzenia rzeczowe?, w: M. A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z teorii i metodologii metafizyki, Lublin 1994, s. 303–313.
Kamiński S., Nauka i filozofia a mądrość, w: S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować? Studia z metodologii filozofii klasycznej, red. T. Szubka, Lublin 1989, s. 55–61.
Kamiński S., O metodzie filozofii klasycznej, „Roczniki Filozoficzne”43 (1986) 1, s. 5–20.
Kamiński S., O ostatecznych przesłankach w klasycznej filozofii bytu, w: M. A. Krapiec, S. Kamiński, Z teorii i metodologii metafizyki, Lublin 1994, s. 327–340.
Kamiński S., Od spostrzeżeń do poglądu na świat, w: S. Kamiński, Światopogląd – religia – teologia. Zagadnienia filozoficzne i metodologiczne, red. M. Walczak, A. Bronk, Lublin 1998, s. 13–32.
Kamiński S., Osobliwość metodologiczna teorii bytu, w: S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować? Studia z metodologii filozofii klasycznej, red. T. Szubka, Lublin 1989, s. 71–87.
Kamiński S., Próba charakterystyki uzasadniania tez w metafizyce klasycznej, w: M. A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z teorii i metodologii metafizyki, Lublin 1994, s. 365–388.
Kamiński S., Typy ludzkiej wiedzy, w: S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować? Studia z metodologii filozofii klasycznej, red. T. Szubka, Lublin 1989, s. 13–32.
Maritain J., Nauka i mądrość, tłum. M. Reutt, Warszawa 2004.
Maritain J., Sztuka i mądrość, tłum. K. K. Górscy, Warszawa 2001.
Morawiec E., Intuicja intelektualna w metafizyce ogólnej Jakuba Maritaina. Studium z historii metodologii metafizyki, Warszawa 2008.
Rembierz M., Jak (powinno się) rozumieć i uprawiać filozofię? O koncepcji filozofii uprawianej przez Stanisława Kamińskiego, w: Stanisław Kamiński, red. K. M. Wolsza, Kraków 2019.
Tomasz z Akwinu, Summa contra gentiles. Prawda wiary chrześcijańskiej, tłum. Z. Włodek, W. Zega, t. 3, Poznań 2009.
Tomasz z Akwinu, Traktat o Bogu. Summa teologii, kwestie 1–26, tłum. G. Kurylewicz, Z. Nerczuk, M. Olszewski, Kraków 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following rules apply to copyright:
1. The author declares that he or she has full copyright to the work, and such copyright it is not limited to the extent applicable to this declaration, that the article is an original work and that it does not infringe any third-party rights.
2. The author agrees to a free-of-charge, non-exclusive and non-restricted use of the work by Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow i.e.:
- to record and duplicate: make copies of the work by means of printing, reprography, magnetic or digital storage;
- to circulate the original or the copies of the work (disseminate, lend or lease the original or copies thereof, publicly display, screen or make the work publicly available so that everyone is able to access it at the time and in place they wish to do so);
- to include the work in a compilation;
- the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow may grant sublicenses Creative Commons Acknowledgement of authorship-Non-commercial use-Without derivative work 3.0 Poland
- the author and the title of the work will be listed,
- the place of publication (name of the periodical and an Internet link to the originally published work),
- the work will be distributed in a non-commercial way,
- no derivative works will be created.
The UPJPII Press does not waive any of its copyrights to any target group.
If you want to publish the text in Logos and Ethos, you must sign the license. However, the signing takes place at a later stage of publishing. Check the license: [license_en.pdf]
